2017
DOI: 10.5849/jof.2016-043r2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Returning Fire to the Land: Celebrating Traditional Knowledge and Fire

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
122
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
122
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A narrow approach to fire management, informed by a predominant worldview, neglects the historically different forms of knowledge that have influenced wildfire management across the world. Place‐based understandings of wildfire dynamics have been gained through cumulative traditional fire knowledge (TFK), defined by Huffman (, p. 1) as “fire‐related knowledge, beliefs and practices that have been developed and applied on specific landscapes for specific purposes by long‐time inhabitants.” This form of knowledge, which is common to Indigenous communities, functions differently from western or scientific ecological knowledge (SEK), which is based on objective documentation of natural phenomena resulting from observation, building on theories of general interest and applicability (Lake et al., ; Mason et al., ). In many countries, TFK‐based fire management changed significantly after colonisation, being partially or completely replaced by an SEK‐centric management approach (Christianson, ; Pyne, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A narrow approach to fire management, informed by a predominant worldview, neglects the historically different forms of knowledge that have influenced wildfire management across the world. Place‐based understandings of wildfire dynamics have been gained through cumulative traditional fire knowledge (TFK), defined by Huffman (, p. 1) as “fire‐related knowledge, beliefs and practices that have been developed and applied on specific landscapes for specific purposes by long‐time inhabitants.” This form of knowledge, which is common to Indigenous communities, functions differently from western or scientific ecological knowledge (SEK), which is based on objective documentation of natural phenomena resulting from observation, building on theories of general interest and applicability (Lake et al., ; Mason et al., ). In many countries, TFK‐based fire management changed significantly after colonisation, being partially or completely replaced by an SEK‐centric management approach (Christianson, ; Pyne, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As examples of these strategies, the Karuk and Yurok Tribes have collaborated with scientists using grants to identify forest conditions that support traditional tribal foods and basketry materials. They have also partnered with various government agencies and nonprofit organizations such as The Nature Conservancy to build capacity for restoring landscape-scale fire across jurisdictional boundaries, through the TRaining EXchange (TREX) program, which shares cross-cultural fire knowledge while conducting strategic prescribed burns (Lake et al 2017).…”
Section: Restoring Fire Regimes Through Adaptive Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, developing understanding of mortality drivers, data collection efforts, and model revision are all likely to be more successful when these efforts integrate the leadership structures, insight into ecological processes, and cultural perspectives of local people (Lake et al. ). We argue that the overall synthesis and especially the framework for devising a conceptual S&T model for an emerging die‐off event (Fig.…”
Section: Experimentation As a Driver Of Conceptual Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More examples from tropical systems, nations with greater dependence on subsistence agriculture, other traditional forest uses, and greater variation in human population densities are likely to include management actions and goals different from our case studies. Further, developing understanding of mortality drivers, data collection efforts, and model revision are all likely to be more successful when these efforts integrate the leadership structures, insight into ecological processes, and cultural perspectives of local people (Lake et al 2017). We argue that the overall synthesis and especially the framework for devising a conceptual S&T model for an emerging die-off event (Fig.…”
Section: Experimentation As a Driver Of Conceptual Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%