1995
DOI: 10.1161/01.str.26.3.399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Return to Work After Stroke

Abstract: The increase of proportion of return to work after stroke was nonlinear, and this trend was referable to the social security systems available to the patients included in this study. Normal muscle strength and absence of apraxia were significant predictors of return to work after stroke. White-collar occupation showed a tendency to promote return to work.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
66
2
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
66
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…30 There were only 3 studies that specifically examined employment status after stroke in samples of people working before stroke and used appropriate analytic strategies with uniform follow-up periods 31,32 or time-to-event analysis. 33 In all of these studies, slightly more than half of the patients had returned to paid employment at 6 to 12 months. In all other studies, either time of follow-up was highly variable or interpretation of results was compromised by problems with definition of work before stroke and at follow-up or results were likely to be confounded by selection bias.…”
Section: Return To Workmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…30 There were only 3 studies that specifically examined employment status after stroke in samples of people working before stroke and used appropriate analytic strategies with uniform follow-up periods 31,32 or time-to-event analysis. 33 In all of these studies, slightly more than half of the patients had returned to paid employment at 6 to 12 months. In all other studies, either time of follow-up was highly variable or interpretation of results was compromised by problems with definition of work before stroke and at follow-up or results were likely to be confounded by selection bias.…”
Section: Return To Workmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…483,489 Furthermore, there has been no investigation of employment maintenance. Despite the limited research, the severity of stroke sequelae frequently has been shown to modulate return to work, with more severe impairments reducing the chance that the stroke survivor will return to work 486,[491][492][493][494] ; accordingly, amelioration of these impairments with the rehabilitation methods discussed in previous sections of the present statement might facilitate vocational reintegration. However, Shaw and colleagues 495 found that individuals' perception of their impairment level was key to returning to work, and thus, it may be that absolute impairment is less important than stroke survivors' beliefs in their abilities (ie, a personal factor within the ICF model).…”
Section: Return To Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Kaplan-Meier method was also applied to health-related vocational management by Saeki et al (49) in a retrospective cohort study to evaluate the longitudinal trend of proportion of patients who return to work after their first stroke. The event of interest is the "return to work after first stroke," which was defined as one month or more of work in active employment after stroke.…”
Section: The Kaplan-meier Product Limit Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Curves are not significantly different by log-rank test (P = 0981), but significantly different by Wilcoxon's test (P = .0492). Source: Saeki et al, 1995 …”
Section: Testing the Equality Of Survival Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation