2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cali.2015.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Return to work after general surgery: A comparative study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with other general surgery procedures, this present study showed a similar recovery time needed to return to work. An observational study published in 2015 showed that mean return to work after general surgery (laparoscopic cholecystectomy, unilateral inguinal hernia and hemorrhoidectomy) was 35.7 days [10]. The reasons for not returning earlier to work were fear of complications (37.5%), pain control (37.5%), surgeon recommendation (12.5%) and general practitioner recommendation (12.5%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared with other general surgery procedures, this present study showed a similar recovery time needed to return to work. An observational study published in 2015 showed that mean return to work after general surgery (laparoscopic cholecystectomy, unilateral inguinal hernia and hemorrhoidectomy) was 35.7 days [10]. The reasons for not returning earlier to work were fear of complications (37.5%), pain control (37.5%), surgeon recommendation (12.5%) and general practitioner recommendation (12.5%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on similar studies, 100 patients were considered sufficient for the purpose of the study [10, 11]. Continuous variables were presented as mean (standard deviation, SD) or median (interquartile range, IQR) according to their distribution (Shapiro–Wilk test) and compared with Mann–Whitney U test or Kruskal–Wallis test when appropriate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%