2020
DOI: 10.1111/disa.12381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Return migration after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster: the impact of institutional and individual factors

Abstract: This paper explores two groups of factors, individual and institutional, that have influenced return migration since the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident in Japan on 11 March 2011. Based on an analysis of statistical data on evacuees, a questionnaire completed by 289 people who migrated, and 19 semi-structured interviews with disaster-affected people, the research found (apropos of institutional factors) that while the lifting of the government's evacuation order has had no immediate effect on return decisio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(52 reference statements)
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples of biological disasters are epidemics, infestations and pests. Finally, societal disasters involve conflicts or intentional acts such as terrorism and cyber attacks, among others (Do, 2019;WHO, 2011;Quarantelli, Lagadec, & Boin, 2007).…”
Section: Theoretical-conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of biological disasters are epidemics, infestations and pests. Finally, societal disasters involve conflicts or intentional acts such as terrorism and cyber attacks, among others (Do, 2019;WHO, 2011;Quarantelli, Lagadec, & Boin, 2007).…”
Section: Theoretical-conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If risks are categorized on a scale all the way from negligible to intolerable [ 16 ], sizable groups of citizens see exposure to radiation as intolerable, even at low doses [ 10 ]. With the Fukushima Daiichi accident, for example, even when all of the financial support for the evacuees had ceased and economic conditions were such that they compelled citizens to return to their homes, 47% of the affected population did not return [ 17 ]. Being female, young, having children [ 18 , 19 ], and having a higher socioeconomic status [ 20 ] correlated with moving permanently from areas near the Fukushima Daiichi accident.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following a disaster, the return of former residents is a crucial factor in the recovery of affected areas. Several key determinants affect evacuees’ decision to return to their hometowns, including a sense of attachment to their home, job obligations, presence of family members in the area [ 21 ], and a sense of anxiety regarding the risk and health effects of radiation exposure [ 22 , 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%