2010
DOI: 10.3905/joi.2010.19.4.116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Return Forecasting by Quantile Regression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…QR has been first suggested by Chan & Lakonishok (1992) as a robust measurement of beta risk in asset pricing test given non-normal return-generating process distribution due to fat-tailed, outliers and extreme returns observations. Following this article, some scholars have employed and proved the estimation efficiency advantages of QR compared to Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) in capital asset pricing model and multifactor asset pricing tests (Allen, Powell, & Singh, 2011; Bassett & Chen, 2001; Lee & Li, 2012; Naifar, 2015; Pohlman & Ma, 2010). To recap, the issue of non-normality and its severe implications in asset pricing test has been raised since in Affleck-Graves and McDonald (1989).…”
Section: Empirical Verification Using Malaysia Stock Market Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…QR has been first suggested by Chan & Lakonishok (1992) as a robust measurement of beta risk in asset pricing test given non-normal return-generating process distribution due to fat-tailed, outliers and extreme returns observations. Following this article, some scholars have employed and proved the estimation efficiency advantages of QR compared to Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) in capital asset pricing model and multifactor asset pricing tests (Allen, Powell, & Singh, 2011; Bassett & Chen, 2001; Lee & Li, 2012; Naifar, 2015; Pohlman & Ma, 2010). To recap, the issue of non-normality and its severe implications in asset pricing test has been raised since in Affleck-Graves and McDonald (1989).…”
Section: Empirical Verification Using Malaysia Stock Market Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower quantiles (below 0.5) represent negative or lower returns and the upper quantiles (above 0.5) represent positive or higher returns. As such, employing QR can assist to discover the full spectrum of data distributions (Pohlman & Ma, 2010).…”
Section: Empirical Verification Using Malaysia Stock Market Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following this, the quantile regression has been first suggested by Chan & Lakonishok (1992) as a robust measurement for beta risk in asset pricing test given non‐normal return‐generating process distribution due to fat tailed, outliers and extreme returns observations. Following this article, some scholars have employed and proved the estimation efficiency advantages of quantile regression in CAPM and multi‐factor asset pricing tests (see Bassett Jr & Chen, 2001; Lee & Li, 2012; Mensi, Hammoudeh, Reboredo, & Nguyen, 2014; Naifar, 2016; Pohlman & Ma, 2010). The application of quantile regression has been extended for panel data by Lamarche (2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower quantiles (0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4) represents negative or lower returns and the upper quantiles (0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9) represents positive or higher returns. As such, employing quantile regression can assist to discover the full spectrum of data distributions (Pohlman & Ma, 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%