Retrospective volume analysis of bone remodeling after tooth extraction with and without deproteinized bovine bone mineral insertion

Abstract

Grafting of the sockets with DBBM and a resorbable barrier insertion seemed to reduce negative osseous remodeling in the short term when compared to that of the ungrafted sockets.

Three‐dimensional analysis of bone remodeling following ridge augmentation of compromised extraction sockets in periodontitis patients: A randomized controlled study

“…Importantly, the baseline CBCT images were taken immediately after tooth removal. This eliminated the need of digital subtraction of pre‐extraction target teeth, as reported in previous studies (Abdelhamid, Omran, Bakhshalian, Tarnow, & Zadeh, ; Crespi et al., ; Sbordone et al., ), and had the advantage to avoid the superimposition of bone and dental tissue.…”

The use of leucocyte and platelet‐rich fibrin in socket management and ridge preservation: a split‐mouth, randomized, controlled clinical trial

“…, Sbordone et al. ). The use of autologous bone particles did not significantly alter the ridge resorptive process (Araújo & Lindhe, ).…”

Extra oral digital scanning and imaging superimposition for volume analysis of bone remodeling after tooth extraction with and without 2 types of particulate porcine mineral insertion: A randomized controlled trial

“…The use of porcine xenograft seemed to be an effective strategy for preserving architecture of the alveolar ridge . As regards studies that employed the same slowly resorbable graft biomaterial, these reported at 4 to 6 months of clinical follow‐up an average loss of the alveolar height of 1 mm; whereas for the same healing period in the control group (non‐grafted), vertical bone loss ranged between 1 and 3.1 mm .…”