Retrospective Study of the Subjective Symptoms and Objective Results in 1000 Vestibular Patients

Baker, Ashley R.; Enticott, Joanne

doi:10.1375/audi.2005.27.1.42

Cited by 2 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The patients were then returned to a seated position and the procedure repeated with the head in the opposite direction. Eye movements were observed via video goggles and recorded using a video [for exact procedures, see Baker and Enticott, 2005]. Patients with nystagmus consistent with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, i.e.…”

Section: Hallpikementioning

confidence: 99%

“…These values were compared with the normal data provided with the system by Micromedical (Micromedical Technologies, version 6 user's guide) which have been validated by our in-house normative data study [Modrovich, 1999]. Time constants were recorded to step velocity testing where normal was considered between 10-30 s. [for detailed procedure, see Baker and Enticott, 2005;Enticott et al, 2005].…”

Section: Rotational Chairmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…ABR responses were obtained for each ear using alternating clicks presented at a rate of 11.1Hz, with white noise presented in the non-test ear. Stimulus intensity was determined based on the hearing thresholds for the poorer ear [for exact procedures, see Baker andSturzebecher et al, 1985]. ABR responses were categorized using the following criteria: abnormally prolonged interpeak or interaural wave differences, and/or absence of later waves (III-V), and/or poor waveform morphology inconsistent with the degree of hearing loss.…”

Section: Auditory Brainstem Responsesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The amplitude ( V) of the summating potential and action potential were calculated with respect to a prestimulus baseline. For detailed methodology, please refer to Baker and Enticott [2005]. The summating/action potential ratio of these potentials was calculated, where a ratio of greater than 0.5 was considered abnormal [Thomas, 2002].…”

Section: Extra-tympanic Electrocochleographymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Neuro-Otological Findings in Patients with Migraine- and Nonmigraine-Related Dizziness

Vitkovic

Paine²,

Rance³

2007

Audiol Neurotol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study presents the neuro-otological findings of 523 patients attending a tertiary vestibular clinic with migraine- and nonmigraine-related dizziness. Subjects were categorized into one of 4 groups, definite migrainous vertigo, probable migrainous vertigo, vestibular disorder coexisting with migraine and nonmigraine-related dizziness. No notable relationship was found between the numbers of abnormal findings between the groups for the majority of the neuro-otological tests. However, there was a significant trend in emetic response to caloric testing. The definite migrainous vertigo group were at least 4 times more likely to be nauseous to caloric testing than any other migraine category. This difference was independent of the magnitude of caloric responses between the emetic migraine groups. While further investigation is required, this study has potentially identified that nauseous/emetic response to caloric stimulation may be a distinguishing factor between migrainous vertigo and other vestibular disorders including those with a coexisting history of migraine.

show abstract

Section: Hallpikementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Rotational Chairmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Auditory Brainstem Responsesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Extra-tympanic Electrocochleographymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Neuro-Otological Findings in Patients with Migraine- and Nonmigraine-Related Dizziness

Vitkovic

Paine²,

Rance³

2007

Audiol Neurotol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Our centre has identified that almost one quarter of patients referred to the RVEEH for vestibular assessment would be suitable for vestibular rehabilitation treatment [Baker and Enticott, 2005]. Vestibular rehabilitation candidacy was retrospectively investigated in 1000 patients based on patient test results showing evidence of uncompensated vestibulopathy or vestibular insufficiency and/ or positive Hallpike tests.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Vestibular Rehabilitation in Individuals with Inner-Ear Dysfunction: A Pilot Study

Enticott

Vitkovic

Reid³

et al. 2007

Audiol Neurotol

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A randomised control prospective study was carried out examining patient outcomes after performing a 10-week vestibular home exercise programme. Thirty-two adults with vestibular dysfunction who reported vestibular symptoms negatively affecting daily life were enrolled. Test subjects were provided with an individualised vestibular rehabilitation programme designed by a physiotherapist. Control subjects received a set of strength and endurance exercises only. All subjects performed their exercises 3 times a day for 10 weeks. Subjective and objective patient measures were collected at 0, 6, 10 and 26 weeks. Results showed that both groups improved after beginning exercise, and that test subjects significantly benefited compared to the controls. These benefits were long term and measurable 6 months later. This study provides evidence that individualised vestibular exercises promote better outcomes for patients with vestibular dysfunction.

show abstract

Retrospective Study of the Subjective Symptoms and Objective Results in 1000 Vestibular Patients

Cited by 2 publications

References 13 publications

Neuro-Otological Findings in Patients with Migraine- and Nonmigraine-Related Dizziness

Neuro-Otological Findings in Patients with Migraine- and Nonmigraine-Related Dizziness

Vestibular Rehabilitation in Individuals with Inner-Ear Dysfunction: A Pilot Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About