2013
DOI: 10.11607/jomi.2648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retrospective Study of the Anterior Loop of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve and the Incisive Canal Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography

Abstract: This assignment applies to all translations of the Work as well as to preliminary display/posting of the abstract of the accepted article in electronic form before publication. If any changes in authorship (order, deletions, or additions) occur after the manuscript is submitted, agreement by all authors for such changes must be on file with the Publisher. An author's name may be removed only at his/her written request. (Note: Material prepared by employees of the US government in the course of their official d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
49
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
49
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are in agreement with the results of Makris et al 4 (2010) and Rosa et al 34 (2013) that detected IC in 91% and 98.5% of cases respectively, using CBCT. According to Pires et al 37 (2012), the ICs could not be identified in all of the CBCT images due to the small diameter of this structure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These findings are in agreement with the results of Makris et al 4 (2010) and Rosa et al 34 (2013) that detected IC in 91% and 98.5% of cases respectively, using CBCT. According to Pires et al 37 (2012), the ICs could not be identified in all of the CBCT images due to the small diameter of this structure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, other investigations 8,10,31,[33][34] have demonstrated that males have longer AL extensions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[27] There was no significant difference (p value = 0.564) between the diameter of the genial plexus in edentulous and dentate patients, the mean value in both groups being 1.24 ± 0.41 mm and 1.24 ± 0.61 mm, respectively. Similar results were found by [28] (mean 1.3 mm, range 0.5 -2 mm at the entrance of the incisive canal) [11] and (mean 1.48 ± 0.66 mm) with no difference in the diameter of the incisive bundle between a dentate and edentulous group. However, reported a mean diameter of 1.8 ± 0.5 mm for this canal [27].…”
Section: Analysis Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Radiographically, it is well-defined up to the region of lateral incisors [9], and in the region of central incisors, the canal image becomes diffuse [7]. In addition to anastomoses [10], the presence of another anatomical accident called the genial plexus [11] or upper and lower genial foramen [3], or also lingual foramen which jointly contributes to the crossed neurovascularization at the level of the mandibular midline [3,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%