2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retrospective study of a 16 year cohort of BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers presenting for RRSO: Prevalence of invasive and in-situ carcinoma, with follow-up

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
30
2
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the available literature, the prevalence of occult cancer found after RRSO varies from 2% to 17%. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]28 In our study, the prevalence of occult cancer in BRCA1/2 positive women was 5.5%, which is similar to what Conner et al have found. 29 We detected fewer occult cancers than Powell et al who reported a rate of 7.9% and more than Reitsma et al (2.2%) and Finch et al (4.2%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the available literature, the prevalence of occult cancer found after RRSO varies from 2% to 17%. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]28 In our study, the prevalence of occult cancer in BRCA1/2 positive women was 5.5%, which is similar to what Conner et al have found. 29 We detected fewer occult cancers than Powell et al who reported a rate of 7.9% and more than Reitsma et al (2.2%) and Finch et al (4.2%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Occult cancers have been reported to occur between 2% and 17% and STICs between 3% and 12%, respectively. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] The occult cancer detection is probably influenced by the age at RRSO, gynaecological screening prior to RRSO, extent of the surgical removal of specimens and the accuracy of tubal pathohistological assessment. It is known that the protocol for sectioning and extensively examining the fimbriated end of the Fallopian tube (SEE-FIM) enables a more exact histopathological examination of the distal tube with its fimbrial part.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most recently, a retrospective study of 527 patients over a span of 16 years evaluated BRCA1/2 carriers undergoing risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. HGSOCs were identified in 2.3% of patients and 59%, were classified as of fallopian tube origin (per aforementioned criteria by Singh) [23,29]. The pith of the study, however, was the finding of isolated STIC in 0.8% of women (4/527).…”
Section: Prevalencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these isolated STICs, two patients with BRCA1 germline mutations went on to develop peritoneal serous carcinoma after a prolonged interval of >7 years. Clonality of the two lesions was established by next generation targeted sequencing demonstrating identical TP53 mutations [29]. Clearly, this long intervening period causes improper clinical follow-up of these patients.…”
Section: Prevalencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…BRCA mutation, especially BRCA2 patients, had higher response rates in neoadjuvant therapies and could benefit from this regime (15,17). Patients with BRCA mutation have shown greater rates of overall survival, longer disease-free interval (DFI) after first-line chemotherapy, better responsiveness in common chemotherapeutic regimens and higher treatment free interval (TFI) between each line of therapy (18,19). For women with BRCA1/2 mutations, progression-free survival is estimated at 15.7 and 21.6 months respectively, and overall survival for both groups were approximately 55.3 and 75.2 months, respectively (15,20).…”
Section: Histologic and Genomic Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%