“…Additionally, the APA took the same stance through several amici curiae briefs supporting gay rights (see citations listed above), through the passing of the resolution stating that homosexuality is not a disorder and that psychologists should not discriminate against individuals who identify as such (APA, 1997), through the report of the American Psychological Association Task Force on Appropriate Therapeutic Responses to Sexual Orientation (APA, 2009), and through the article published by the APA concluding that there is insufficient evidence supporting efforts to change sexual orientation (Munsey, 2009). However, research continues to be conducted on therapeutic approaches (e.g., conversion therapy, reparative therapy, sexual orientation change efforts [SOCE]) for treating homosexuality (e.g., Karten & Wade, 2010; Nicolosi, 2009; Nicolosi, Byrd, & Potts, 2000; Spitzer, 2003; Throckmorton, 2002) 3 . There are several examples, such as this, of conflicting evidence in the literature on controversial issues; however, it is psychologists’ professional duty to critically evaluate what they read and take into account limitations of the studies before drawing conclusions and holding a public position based on research.…”