2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2008.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retrospective: Radiation damage and its associated “Information Limitations”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
80
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
80
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A new barrier emerged during the early 1970's with the realization that organic specimens could not be visualized directly in the electron microscope because either the electron beam destroyed the specimen or, if the image was recorded without damaging the specimen, it contained too few electrons to be interpreted directly (Glaeser, 1971;Glaeser, 2008). Negative stain had the useful property that, when exposed to high doses of electrons, specimens reached a relatively stable end point in which the protein would be obliterated but its outlines were still retained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A new barrier emerged during the early 1970's with the realization that organic specimens could not be visualized directly in the electron microscope because either the electron beam destroyed the specimen or, if the image was recorded without damaging the specimen, it contained too few electrons to be interpreted directly (Glaeser, 1971;Glaeser, 2008). Negative stain had the useful property that, when exposed to high doses of electrons, specimens reached a relatively stable end point in which the protein would be obliterated but its outlines were still retained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The untoward effects of high-energy beam bombardment are exaggerated in the vacuum conditions typical to electron microscope systems (Stevens-Kalceff, 2004). Beam damage and beam-induced movement are fundamental restricts for resolution power of electron microscopy (Glaeser, 2008). Beam-induced heating is associated with thickening of the oxide layer on the material under study through electron beam-facilitated mass transport across the oxide layer within a defect-related circuit (Baker et al, 2010).…”
Section: Beam Damagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The appropriate time and amount of electron exposure should be determined experimentally with the goal of sufficient exposures for obtaining useful signal-to-noise ratio and high-resolution images without image destruction (Baker et al, 2010). The relationship between inherent image contrast, applied exposure for image recording and image quality should be considered for getting a balanced state Glaeser, 2008). This is worth to note the fact that very high-quality images could nevertheless be obtained but averaging obtained images might be helpful in approximating the well-defined resolution limit (Glaeser, 2008).…”
Section: Beam Damagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diese Schicht kann durch vorsichtige Bestrahlung mit einem Elektronenstrahl geringer Intensität nachgewiesen und entfernt werden (Abbildung 5 e-h); dabei ist darauf zu achten, dass die Integrität der darunter liegenden Probe nicht beschädigt wird. [24] Die schädigende Wirkung von Elektronenstrahlen kann durch Absenken der Probentemperatur verringert werden, beispielsweise um einen Faktor von 3-6 zwischen Raumtemperatur und der Temperatur flüssigen Stickstoffs. [25] Dennoch sind auch bei Kryo-TEM-Proben sowohl die eingebetteten Nanostrukturen als auch die glasartige Matrix (besonders bei organischen Lösungsmitteln) empfindlich gegen Elektronenstrahl-induzierte Veränderungen.…”
Section: Tem-abbildung Selbstorganisierter Strukturenunclassified