2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2012.12.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retrospective group fusion similarity search based on eROCE evaluation metric

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was performed by using in vitro COX inhibitor screening assays. Furthermore, molecular docking studies were performed in order to predict the binding mode of compounds A1 – 13 , based on our previous expertise in this field [ 19 , 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was performed by using in vitro COX inhibitor screening assays. Furthermore, molecular docking studies were performed in order to predict the binding mode of compounds A1 – 13 , based on our previous expertise in this field [ 19 , 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39 Rho-associated protein kinase 1. 40 Serine/threonine-protein kinase pim-2. 41 Cell division cycle 7-related protein kinase.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each LBVS experiment employing 3D similarity search with ROCS and EON was validated according to acknowledged virtual screening assessment parameters (ROC‐AUC) and eROCE in a concerted way since none of them is a flawless indicator of ranking performance. Receiver operating characteristic curve – area under the curve (ROC‐AUC) was used to evaluate LBVS experiments .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Receiver operating characteristic curve – area under the curve (ROC‐AUC) was used to evaluate LBVS experiments . Since “early enrichment” cannot be well illustrated by AUC, even at higher AUC values, an evaluation parameter introduced by our group eROCE involves a multi‐grade‐FPR weighting system, seeking to smooth the effect of hard cutoffs by attributing decreasing weights to each „active” detected along the hierarchical list . We generated heatmaps to suggest meaningful differences in the AUC and eROCE values.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%