2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.xops.2021.100015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retrospective Evaluation of Somatic Alterations in Cell-Free DNA from Blood in Retinoblastoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aqueous humor is a suitable source to obtain cell-free DNA from patients with retinoblastoma, allowing not only the diagnosis of RB1 mutations but also identifying potential genomic markers for the risk of treatment failure [34]. The use of hybridization capture and deep sequencing of around 20,000X raw coverage further improves the sensitivity of this technique, allowing the analysis of RB1 aberrations in cell-free DNA in blood samples [35]. However, deep sequencing techniques are generally not available outside large world-referral institutions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aqueous humor is a suitable source to obtain cell-free DNA from patients with retinoblastoma, allowing not only the diagnosis of RB1 mutations but also identifying potential genomic markers for the risk of treatment failure [34]. The use of hybridization capture and deep sequencing of around 20,000X raw coverage further improves the sensitivity of this technique, allowing the analysis of RB1 aberrations in cell-free DNA in blood samples [35]. However, deep sequencing techniques are generally not available outside large world-referral institutions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of the 20 patients with bony disease at diagnosis of stage 4a RB relapsed at the original bony site of involvement, and our nonrandomized data suggest that IFRT may not be necessary in patients with bony metastases noted to be in CR or VGPR post ASCT. More sensitive measures for assessment of residual disease are desirable and emerging plasma cell‐free DNA technologies merit evaluation to risk stratify patients at high risk of relapse 17,18 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are to be interpreted with caution particularly with regard to undetectable cfDNA or VAF thresholds: false-negative results may exist in the presence of active intraocular tumor. 14 An expanded cohort with more regimented collection time points will advance our knowledge further.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%