2015
DOI: 10.1111/vec.12328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retrospective evaluation of prognostic indicators in dogs with head trauma: 72 cases (January–March 2011)

Abstract: Dogs that did not survive following head trauma were more likely to have poor perfusion, severe concurrent injuries reflected by increased ATT scores, severe traumatic brain injury as evidenced by decreased MGCS or increased mentation scores, or requirement for HS administration or endotracheal intubation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
49
2
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
6
49
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The score is easy to use and can be performed by all practitioners, as it is intended to be calculated based on physical examination findings. Since development, the association of ATT with outcome in dogs has been demonstrated in multiple retrospective studies . A prospective, multicenter study of ATT in dogs found that an ATT ≥ 5 had an 83% sensitivity and 91% specificity in predicting nonsurvival in dogs with trauma .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The score is easy to use and can be performed by all practitioners, as it is intended to be calculated based on physical examination findings. Since development, the association of ATT with outcome in dogs has been demonstrated in multiple retrospective studies . A prospective, multicenter study of ATT in dogs found that an ATT ≥ 5 had an 83% sensitivity and 91% specificity in predicting nonsurvival in dogs with trauma .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ATT score is based on a 0–3 scale (0 being slight or no injury, 3 indicating severe injury) with assessment of 6 independent components (perfusion, cardiac, respiratory, eye/muscle/skin, skeletal, and neurologic) that contribute equally to the overall predictive score (see Table in the Appendix). The ATT has been widely utilized in veterinary medicine, both clinically and in clinical research settings . However, despite its utility as a benchmark veterinary trauma score, the ATT has received relatively limited prospective validation and has not been updated in the last 20 years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Embora cães e gatos possuam uma habilidade marcante de compensar a perda do tecido cerebral após trauma craniano (Dewey 2000, Sande & West 2010, lesões graves estão associadas a alto índice de mortalidade (Dewey 2000), que ocorre principalmente devido à baixa perfusão e oxigenação cerebral (Garosi & Adamantos 2011, Sharma & Holowaychuk 2015. Além disso, nos cães que sobrevivem pode não haver capacidade funcional como animais de estimação, pois vários pacientes apresentam sequelas neurológicas importantes (Vianna & Arias 2013), conforme constatado no presente estudo, evidenciando que o prognóstico para esses pacientes é considerado de reservado a mau (Dewey 2000).…”
Section: Trauma Cranioencefálicounclassified