1994
DOI: 10.1002/cyto.990180303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retrospective evaluation of flow cytometry as a platelet crossmatching procedure

Abstract: We performed a retrospective analysis of flow cytometry as a platelet crossmatching procedure. Sera from 17 alloimmunized refractory patients were tested against 32 donor platelets, which had been stored as platelet-rich plasma for up to 36 months. Overall, 14/32 (44%) crossmatches were positive. The mean 1 h posttransfusion corrected count increments (CCls) were 9,195 and 2,269 for a negative and a positive crossmatch, respectively. The predictive value of a positive crossmatch was 86%, whereas the predictive… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The availability of this automated workstation will allow us to address other important considerations, including capital equipment costs, disposable and reagent costs, sample turnaround time and throughput, and reproducibility of assay performance in other transfusion service and blood center environments. Furthermore, the availability of this workstation will allow us to investigate complete automation of other pretransfusion tests, including quantitation of residual WBCs after filtration, PLT cross‐matching, bacterial detection, and quantitation of fetal–maternal hemorrhage, all of which have been previously performed by traditional flow cytometry 11‐19 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The availability of this automated workstation will allow us to address other important considerations, including capital equipment costs, disposable and reagent costs, sample turnaround time and throughput, and reproducibility of assay performance in other transfusion service and blood center environments. Furthermore, the availability of this workstation will allow us to investigate complete automation of other pretransfusion tests, including quantitation of residual WBCs after filtration, PLT cross‐matching, bacterial detection, and quantitation of fetal–maternal hemorrhage, all of which have been previously performed by traditional flow cytometry 11‐19 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The isotypes of these antibodies among the 32 CSi/ FC-positive cases with PEG could be identified via twocolor FC (n): IgG only (19), and IgM only (5: anti-E 3; anti-M 1; anti-c 1), both IgG and IgM (8).…”
Section: Comparison Between Individual and Pooled Screening Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flow cytometry (FC) has been previously utilized for antibody detection, including the detection of red cell autoantibodies (4,5), HLA alloantibodies (6,7), platelet crossmatching (8)(9)(10), and other immmunohematological applications (11,12). Recently, FC was also introduced for the screening of antibodies to red cells for automation by Roback et al (3,13).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Platelet cross matching by flow cytometry was addressed in many studies [14,15]. However, the predictive role of flow cytometric platelet cross-matching on transfusion response and its affection by the presence of clinical factors, HLA alloimmunization, and transfusion of HLA-matched platelet were not fully evaluated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%