2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2006.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retrospective determination of ceruloplasmin in newborn screening blood spots of patients with Wilson disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The disease frequency is highly variable, and WD is seen more frequently in Sardinia, China, Japan, and other Asian populations (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9). Underdiagnosis of WD is highly likely, especially during the asymptomatic phase and in patients with atypical presentations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The disease frequency is highly variable, and WD is seen more frequently in Sardinia, China, Japan, and other Asian populations (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9). Underdiagnosis of WD is highly likely, especially during the asymptomatic phase and in patients with atypical presentations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linearity was established between 20 and 95 mg/dL (200 and 950 mg/L), with correlation coefficient (R 2 ) Ն0.98. Stability of DBS was tested previously, and long-term stability was observed in specimens maintained at Ϫ20°C for years (11 ).…”
Section: Validation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patient samples used for method correlation were the same as in a previous study (7,11 ). Protein extraction, reduction, and digestion were performed in a single step.…”
Section: Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If father is bi chance heterozygous, chance of fetal affection is 50% [1].This new-born needed screening as the paternal status was unknown. Measurement of ceruloplasmin level in Guthrie dried blood spots of new-born had been advised, which they could not afford at that time [5]. However a negative blood or urine screening of a new born do not entirely rule out the disease process and a repeat screening should be advised at two to fi ve years of age [1].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%