2016
DOI: 10.1002/erv.2434
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retrospective Correlates for Bulimia Nervosa: A Matched Case–Control Study

Abstract: The common findings across cultures suggest that, at least, individuals subjectively experience a number of similar factors that increase risk for developing BN. In addition, the difference regarding self-harm is notable.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
38
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(52 reference statements)
1
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Howe, 2007), with medium to large effect sizes (ORs between 2.50-7.43, d's between 0.56-0.88). Although rates of appearanceunrelated teasing victimization were also higher for BN cases compared to healthy controls (ORs between 1.20-6.0), these differences were not significantly different (Fairburn et al, 1997;Gonçalves et al, 2016).…”
Section: Victimization: Are Individuals With Eds More Frequently Bumentioning
confidence: 78%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Howe, 2007), with medium to large effect sizes (ORs between 2.50-7.43, d's between 0.56-0.88). Although rates of appearanceunrelated teasing victimization were also higher for BN cases compared to healthy controls (ORs between 1.20-6.0), these differences were not significantly different (Fairburn et al, 1997;Gonçalves et al, 2016).…”
Section: Victimization: Are Individuals With Eds More Frequently Bumentioning
confidence: 78%
“…For BN, there was a clear association with bullying and teasing victimization. Compared to healthy controls, individuals with BN were significantly more likely to have been teased about their appearance and bullied (Fairburn et al, ; Gonçalves et al, ; Hilbert et al, ; Kaltiala‐Heino et al, ; Kaltiala‐Heino et al, ; Lehoux & Howe, ), with medium to large effect sizes (ORs between 2.50–7.43, d 's between 0.56–0.88). Although rates of appearance‐unrelated teasing victimization were also higher for BN cases compared to healthy controls (ORs between 1.20–6.0), these differences were not significantly different (Fairburn et al, ; Gonçalves et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations