Retrospective clinical study on sinus bone graft and tapered-body implant placement

Kim, Jong-Hwa; Kim, Young-Kyun; Bae, Ji-Hyun

doi:10.5125/jkaoms.2013.39.2.77

Cited by 7 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Herzberg et al 21 examined 70 patients with 212 implants placed in 81 maxillary sinus regions during the period 1995 to 2000 and reported 95.5% and 83.7% cumulative survival and success rates, respectively, for 4.5 years. The study of Kim et al 27 showed that the mean marginal bone resorption around the implants was 0.69 mm 1 year after prosthodontic loading. Marginal bone resorption of more than 1.5 mm occurred in 9 implants, for a success rate of 88%.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Assessment of the autogenous bone graft for sinus elevation

Wang

Kim

Cho

et al. 2013

J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesThe posterior maxillary region often provides a limited bone volume for dental implants. Maxillary sinus elevation via inserting a bone graft through a window opened in the lateral sinus wall has become the most common surgical procedure for increasing the alveolar bone height in place of dental implants in the posterior maxillary region. The purpose of this article is to assess the change of bone volume and the clinical effects of dental implant placement in sites with maxillary sinus floor elevation and autogenous bone graft through the lateral window approach.Materials and MethodsIn this article, the analysis data were collected from 64 dental implants that were placed in 24 patients with 29 lacks of the bone volume posterior maxillary region from June 2004 to April 2011, at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Inha University Hospital. Panoramic views were taken before the surgery, after the surgery, 6 months after the surgery, and at the time of the final follow-up. The influence of the factors on the grafted bone material resorption rate was evaluated according to the patient characteristics (age and gender), graft material, implant installation stage, implant size, implant placement region, local infection, surgical complication, and residual alveolar bone height.ResultsThe bone graft resorption rate of male patients at the final follow-up was significantly higher than the rate of female patients. The single autogenous bone-grafted site was significantly more resorbed than the autogenous bone combined with the Bio-Oss grafted site. The implant installation stage and residual alveolar height showed a significant correlation with the resorption rate of maxillary sinus bone graft material. The success rate and survival rate of the implant were 92.2% and 100%, respectively.ConclusionMaxillary sinus elevation procedure with autogenous bone graft or autogenous bone in combination with Bio-Oss is a predictable treatment method for implant rehabilitation.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…The study of Kim et al27 showed that the mean marginal bone resorption around the implants was 0.69 mm 1 year after prosthodontic loading. Marginal bone resorption of more than 1.5 mm occurred in 9 implants, for a success rate of 88%.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Assessment of the autogenous bone graft for sinus elevation

Wang

Kim

Cho

et al. 2013

J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Many studies regarding implant survival rates have been published. Sato et al [8] presented that survival rate of 1-piece implants placed in immediate function was 100%, also Kim et al [9] showed that success rate was 92%, and the survival rate was 96.0% in tapered body implant with sinus bone gra . Moreover, Suh et al [10] showed survival rate of ITI TE ® implants was 100% in 3-year clinical study.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical evaluation of implants survival rate: Eight-year retrospective study

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: Since endosseous implants are used for the treatment of various types of tooth loss, they are considered a primary therapeutic options. Many studies regarding implant survival rates have been published. However, there have been few long-term studies on implant survival rate in Koreans. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine implant survival rate for 8 years as well as identify potential risk factors for failure. Materials and Methods:The present study included 535 implants in 332 patients at the Department of Periodontology of Wonkwang Dental Hospital. By means of a chart review, 1) implant site, 2) age and sex of patients, 3) diameter and length of placed implant, 4) advanced technique at recipient site, 5) periodontal treatments before implant therapy, and 6) systemic diseases such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, or osteoporosis were recorded. The effects of evaluated variables on implant failure were analyzed using chi-square test. Statistical significance was accepted at p<0.05. Results: The present study showed an implant survival rate of 97.76%. Overall, 12 of 535 (2.24%) implants were explanted. Two explanted implants were in the maxillary anterior area, five were in the maxillary posterior area, and five were in the mandibular posterior area. The average time from placement to explantation was 11.92±15.30 months. None of the investigated factors was significantly associated with implant failure (p>0.05). Conclusion:Survival rate in this study was 97.76%. Despite the lack of significant association between implant failure and associated factors, there are potential risk factors. Cautious diagnosis and treatment planning are needed.

show abstract

“…Using dental implants for prosthetic rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla has become a routine dental procedure. However, low quality of the posterior maxillary bone and a highly pneumatised maxillary sinus can compromise an implant's survival 1 2 . Implant migration into the paranasal sinus cavities is a rare but a significant complication.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Disappearance of a dental implant after migration into the maxillary sinus: an unusual case

Damlar

2015

J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Migration of dental implants into the maxillary sinus is uncommon. However, poor bone quality and quantity in the posterior maxilla can increase the potential for this complication to arise during implant placement procedures. The aim of this report is to present a dental implant that migrated into the maxillary sinus and disappeared. A 53-year-old male patient was referred to us by his dentist after a dental implant migrated into his maxillary sinus. The displaced implant was discovered on a panoramic radiograph taken five days before his referral. Using computed tomography, we determined that the displaced dental implant was not in the antrum. There was also no sign of oroantral fistula. Because of the small size of the displaced implant, we think that the implant may have left the maxillary sinus via the ostium.

show abstract

Retrospective clinical study on sinus bone graft and tapered-body implant placement

Cited by 7 publications

References 17 publications

Assessment of the autogenous bone graft for sinus elevation

Assessment of the autogenous bone graft for sinus elevation

Clinical evaluation of implants survival rate: Eight-year retrospective study

Disappearance of a dental implant after migration into the maxillary sinus: an unusual case

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About