2015
DOI: 10.1155/2015/747309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retrospective Clinical and Radiological Outcomes after Robotic Assisted Bicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

Abstract: Purpose. Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty (BiKA) is a favorable alternative to total knee arthroplasty for degenerative disease limited to two knee compartments. Recently developed robotic-assisted systems improved the clinical efficacy of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty by providing enhanced component positioning with dynamic ligament balancing. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short-term outcomes of patients, undergoing bicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a single institution by a single su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4,9,10 However, these complications can be remedied by computer navigated and robot-assisted knee arthroplasty, which assists in bone preparation and with postoperative limb alignment. 11 These newer modalities were developed in order to improve the outcomes of knee arthroplasty. Computer-navigated knee arthroplasties utilize preoperative computerized tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or infrared studies to register intraoperative landmarks and create a 3-dimensional operation model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,9,10 However, these complications can be remedied by computer navigated and robot-assisted knee arthroplasty, which assists in bone preparation and with postoperative limb alignment. 11 These newer modalities were developed in order to improve the outcomes of knee arthroplasty. Computer-navigated knee arthroplasties utilize preoperative computerized tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or infrared studies to register intraoperative landmarks and create a 3-dimensional operation model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kayani et al 14 reported that the average operating time of UKA surgery assisted by the MAKO system was 87.3 min within the learning curve, and the average operating time when surgeons were familiar with operation processes was 61.7 min, which was not different from traditional surgery. Tamam et al 18 reported in 2015 that the average operation time of MAKO‐assisted UKA was 40.5 min (ranging from 23 to 151 min), the shortest operation time in all included literature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high revision rate, compared with total knee arthroplasty, may be related to several factors such as implant design, patient selection, crude or absent instrumentation, or component malalignment, which can all contribute to the relatively high failure rate [ 24 ]. With more modern instrumentation, including the aid of a robot, the results seem to be more promising with 83% good to excellent results at a mean follow-up of 27 months [ 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%