2003
DOI: 10.1054/ijom.2002.0270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retromandibular approach to the mandibular condyle: a clinical and cadaveric study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
72
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
72
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The buccal branch was encountered in 4 cases, the zygomatic branch in one case and the marginal mandibular branch in one case. MANISALI et al reported that the branches of the facial nerve were encountered in 30% of the cases 14 . In a cadaveric study, using 30 facial halves (15 fresh cadavers), branches of the facial nerve were encountered in 12 dissections (40%) 14 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The buccal branch was encountered in 4 cases, the zygomatic branch in one case and the marginal mandibular branch in one case. MANISALI et al reported that the branches of the facial nerve were encountered in 30% of the cases 14 . In a cadaveric study, using 30 facial halves (15 fresh cadavers), branches of the facial nerve were encountered in 12 dissections (40%) 14 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Manisali et al [21] in their study noticed temporary weakness of the facial nerve in 30%, and Ellis et al [16] in 17.2% of the cases but this resolved in all cases within 3 months and there were no cases of permanent nerve injury. Delvin et al [20] also recorded transient facial nerve weakness affecting the marginal mandibular branch in 7.1% of their cases however Hyde et al [2] in their study found all patients with normally functioning facial nerve at 1-month review.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Transient facial nerve weakness was seen in two patients, which resolved within 3 months postoperatively. Manisali et al [22], Ellis et al [21] and Delvin et al [31] also recorded transient facial nerve weakness postoperatively. Hyde et al [32] observed no weakness of facial nerve in any of the patients in their study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Extraoral approaches simplify the management of condylar fractures but are still associated with some unresolved issues. Many of the extraoral approaches can become technically demanding and present definite risks of facial nerve injury and unpleasant scarring [19][20][21][22][23]. Open reduction and rigid fixation allows good anatomic repositioning, restoration of the ramal length, avoidance of long term sequelae like clicking and late arthritic changes and an earlier return to normal function without the need for inter maxillary fixation [24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%