2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)03513-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retrograde autologous priming of the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit reduces blood transfusion after coronary artery surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
49
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients in the RAP group had a higher haematocrit on bypass and fewer patients needed transfusion of PRBC, which is in accordance with findings by other investigators [7][8][9][10][11][12][13] . Although the NON-RAP group counted more female patients, who have a predetermined higher transfusion risk as compared to male patients, both bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated a prominent effect of RAP on transfusion of PRBC.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Patients in the RAP group had a higher haematocrit on bypass and fewer patients needed transfusion of PRBC, which is in accordance with findings by other investigators [7][8][9][10][11][12][13] . Although the NON-RAP group counted more female patients, who have a predetermined higher transfusion risk as compared to male patients, both bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated a prominent effect of RAP on transfusion of PRBC.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The meta-analysis 8 of the six randomised controlled trials [2][3][4][5][6][7] investigating RAP showed a 64% reduction (odds ratio [OR]: 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.13-0.94, p=0.04) in the need for the use of blood intraoperatively and a 74% reduction (OR: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.13-0.52, p=0.0001) in the need for blood during a hospital stay. The mean intraoperative fluid balance was not significantly different in RAP patients (1,574.6ml) compared with the control groups (2,016.2ml) (p=0.44).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To undertake such a protocol is both medically justified and feasible. The restraining factor in the implementation of such a protocol is cost, as the proposed blood conservation protocol relies upon two medications: aprotinin and EPO [3,24]. Hence, the cost-benefit analysis depends primarily on the price of EPO.…”
Section: ) Legal and Ethical Aspects Of Non Transfusionmentioning
confidence: 99%