2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b01789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retrieving the Quantitative Chemical Information at Nanoscale from Scanning Electron Microscope Energy Dispersive X-ray Measurements by Machine Learning

Abstract: The quantitative composition of metal alloy nanowires on InSb semiconductor surface and gold nanostructures on germanium surface is determined by blind source separation (BSS) machine learning method using non-negative matrix factorization from energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) spectrum image maps measured in a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The BSS method blindly decomposes the collected EDX spectrum image into three source components, which correspond directly to the X-ray signals coming from t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By examining the interplanar spacing of the atomic columns and their contrast in the HAADF STEM imaging, the nanowire composition is identified as an AuIn2 alloy 21 . AuIn2 nanowire's stoichiometry is also confirmed by the SEM/EDX measurement results which were analyzed by a newly developed method of chemical quantification based on the Machine Learning approach 32 .…”
Section: /31mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…By examining the interplanar spacing of the atomic columns and their contrast in the HAADF STEM imaging, the nanowire composition is identified as an AuIn2 alloy 21 . AuIn2 nanowire's stoichiometry is also confirmed by the SEM/EDX measurement results which were analyzed by a newly developed method of chemical quantification based on the Machine Learning approach 32 .…”
Section: /31mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…They extract local information on material structure based on statistical analysis of atomic neighborhoods based on Fourier Transform followed by clustering and multivariate algorithms like Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Independent Component Analysis (ICA). The Machine Learning approaches could be also successfully used for hyper-spectral EDX imaging in STEM (Rossouw et al, 2015) and in SEM (Jany et al, 2017b). The collected hyperspectral images in form of data cube i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the various BSS algorithms, the most common two applied to X-ray microanalysis are the independent component analysis (ICA) and the nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF), which both consider each decomposed component as a typical event occurring between the electron beam and the specimen [11][12][13]. The main difference between the two algorithms is that the NMF only allows additive combinations and prevents subtractions to force all components to be nonnegative, but the ICA allows both combinations and subtractions [14,15]. Even though the BSS can be performed independently, it usually requires the PCA as a preliminary step to make the original dataset less correlated and decide the ummixed dimension [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main difference between the two algorithms is that the NMF only allows additive combinations and prevents subtractions to force all components to be nonnegative, but the ICA allows both combinations and subtractions [14,15]. Even though the BSS can be performed independently, it usually requires the PCA as a preliminary step to make the original dataset less correlated and decide the ummixed dimension [14]. There are more and more studies using the combination of PCA and BSS to distinguish different phases instead of the traditional elemental identification method [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%