2012
DOI: 10.1190/geo2012-0031.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retrieving 2D structures from surface-wave data by means of space-varying spatial windowing

Abstract: Surface-wave techniques are mainly used to retrieve 1D subsurface models. However, in 2D environments, the 1D approach usually neglects the presence of lateral variations and because the surface-wave path crosses different materials, the resulting model is a simplified or misleading description of the site. We tested a processing technique to retrieve 2D structures from surface-wave data acquired with a limited number of receivers. Our technique was based on a two-step process. First, we extracted several loca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The classical method accurately inverts for a 1D S-wave velocity model, but becomes less accurate with increasing lateral heterogeneity in the subsurface velocity model. The 1D assumption is not satisfied for some practical applications, so partial remedies are spatial interpolation of 1D velocity models (Tian et al, 2003) and laterally constrained inversion (Socco et al, 2014;Bergamo et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classical method accurately inverts for a 1D S-wave velocity model, but becomes less accurate with increasing lateral heterogeneity in the subsurface velocity model. The 1D assumption is not satisfied for some practical applications, so partial remedies are spatial interpolation of 1D velocity models (Tian et al, 2003) and laterally constrained inversion (Socco et al, 2014;Bergamo et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classical method accurately inverts for a 1-D S-wave velocity model, but becomes less accurate with increasing lateral heterogeneity in the subsurface. The 1-D assumption is not satisfied for some practical applications, so partial remedies are spatial interpolation of 1-D velocity models (Yamanaka & Ishida 1996;Xia et al 1999;Beaty et al 2002;Tian et al 2003;Dal Moro 2015;Pan et al 2016b) and laterally constrained inversion (Socco et al 2010;Bergamo & Socco 2012). In comparison, full waveform inversion (FWI) can theoretically account for any lateral heterogeneity, but it is computationally expensive and can easily get stuck in local minima associated with the objective function (Tarantola 1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classical method accurately inverts for a 1D S-wave velocity model, but becomes less accurate with increasing lateral heterogeneity in the subsurface. The 1D assumption is not satisfied for some practical applications, so partial remedies are spatial interpolation of 1D velocity models (Xia et al, 1999) and laterally constrained inversion (Socco et al, 2010;Bergamo et al, 2012). In comparison, full waveform inversion (FWI) can theoretically account for any lateral heterogeneity, but it is computationally expensive and can easily get stuck in local minima associated with the objective function (Tarantola, 1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%