2003
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0426(2003)20<534:rolbas>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retrieval of Lake Bulk and Skin Temperatures Using Along-Track Scanning Radiometer (ATSR-2) Data: A Case Study Using Lake Tahoe, California

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
73
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Though the validation with in-situ data show good agreement, it is important to note that the satellite sensor measures temperature of a sub-micron layer between water surface and air which is highly variable according to the meteorological conditions, whereas in-situ data represents bulk temperatures in the lake [47,48]. Due to the skin effect over the lake surface there is a considerable difference between the skin and bulk temperature which may also reflect the actual differences between satellite derived LSWT and the in-situ data [46,48]. The accuracy of the derived LSWT also depends upon the viewing zenith angle at which the observation is taken (nadir or wide angle) [43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Though the validation with in-situ data show good agreement, it is important to note that the satellite sensor measures temperature of a sub-micron layer between water surface and air which is highly variable according to the meteorological conditions, whereas in-situ data represents bulk temperatures in the lake [47,48]. Due to the skin effect over the lake surface there is a considerable difference between the skin and bulk temperature which may also reflect the actual differences between satellite derived LSWT and the in-situ data [46,48]. The accuracy of the derived LSWT also depends upon the viewing zenith angle at which the observation is taken (nadir or wide angle) [43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The suite of field sensors has been used to perform thermal calibration assessment of a number of sensors including MODIS and ASTER and therefore uses radiometers with a wide bandpass [15][16][17]. Because the radiometers are not filtered to match the Landsat spectral bandpass, the surface temperature, corrected for the cool skin effect, is computed using a combination of the observed radiometric temperature, the near surface contact temperature and the downwelling radiance computed from MODTRAN [14,15].…”
Section: Jpl Lake Tahoe and Salton Seamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 6a), especially during summer months and is mostly driven by the radiation budget and the meteorological conditions (Hook et al, 2003;Minnett et al, 2011). Periods with -dotted), the 95 % confidence interval of the regression line, the coefficient of determination as square of the correlation coefficient (R 2 ), the root-mean-square error (RMSE), the Bias as the mean temperature difference and standard deviation (∆T ± σ ∆T ) between MODIS and RT-lswt, and the number of coincident observations (within ±15 minutes).…”
Section: In Situ Datamentioning
confidence: 99%