Retrieval constraints on the front end create differences in recollection on a subsequent test

Marsh, Richard L.; Meeks, J. Thadeus; Cook, Gabriel I.; Clark-Foos, Arlo; Hicks, Jason L.; Brewer, Gene A.

doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.06.005

Cited by 30 publications

(55 citation statements)

References 30 publications

(39 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition, we confirmed that deep foils make up a higher proportion of "remember" responses than do shallow foils, consistent with Marsh et al (2009). This suggests that an increase in detail is associated with the foils from the test of deeply encoded words relative to those from the test of shallowly encoded words.…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 84%

“…This finding is in line with that of Jacoby, Shimizu, Daniels, and Rhodes (2005). In contrast, no memory-for-foils effect was found when encoding was strengthened using repetition, where items were presented once versus three times (Marsh et al, 2009;see Replication 2 in the Appendix). Clearly, the important requirement is that the mode of encoding be sufficiently coherent that it can be reenacted at the time of retrieval.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 94%

“…Thus far, there has been no direct evidence for mode reinstatement in any of the reported studies (Jacoby, Shimizu, Daniels, & Rhodes, 2005;Jacoby, Shimizu, Velanova, & Rhodes, 2005;Marsh et al, 2009). Although better recognition of foils that accompany deeply processed targets is consistent with deeper processing of those foils, which in turn is consistent with a deeper mode of processing, that logic is indirect.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 88%

“…A further conceptual replication is provided by including a remember/know judgment in the final recognition test. This type of decision is included to assess the quality of the judgments: More "remember" responses would be linked to recognition associated with greater detail, which we would expect to see associated with foil words from the deep imagery test (similar to the findings of Marsh et al, 2009). …”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Marsh et al (2009) demonstrated, using the remember/ know procedure introduced by Tulving (1985), that words that had been initially tested in the context of deep encoding not only were subsequently remembered better, but also had more detail-based memories than their shallowly encoded counterparts. In our Experiment 1, participants were also asked to make a remember/know distinction on the final test.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Source-constrained retrieval influences the encoding of new information

2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Jacoby, Shimizu, Daniels, and Rhodes (Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 852-857, 2005) showed that new words presented as foils among a list of old words that had been deeply encoded were themselves subsequently better recognized than new words presented as foils among a list of old words that had been shallowly encoded. In Experiment 1, by substituting a deep-versus-shallow imagery manipulation for the levels-of-processing manipulation, we demonstrated that the effect is robust and that it generalizes, also occurring with a different type of encoding. In Experiment 2, we provided more direct evidence for context-related encoding during tests of deeply encoded words, showing enhanced priming for foils presented among deeply encoded targets when participants made the same deep-encoding judgments on those items as had been made on the targets during study. In Experiment 3, we established that the findings from Experiment 2 are restricted to this specific deep judgment task and are not a general consequence of these foils being associated with deeply encoded items. These findings provide support for the sourceconstrained retrieval hypothesis of Jacoby, Shimizu, Daniels, and Rhodes: New information can be influenced by how surrounding items are encoded and retrieved, as long as the surrounding items recruit a coherent mode of processing.

show abstract

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 84%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 94%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 88%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Source-constrained retrieval influences the encoding of new information

2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Closing the door to false memory: the effects of levels-of-processing and stimulus type on the rejection of perceptually vs. semantically dissimilar distractors

Nieznański

Obidziński

2021

Psychological Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

False recognition memory for nonstudied items that share features with targets can be reduced by retrieval monitoring mechanisms. The recall-to-reject process, for example, involves the recollection of information about studied items that disqualifies inconsistent test probes. Monitoring for specific features during retrieval may be enhanced by an encoding orientation that is recapitulated during retrieval. In two experiments, we used concrete words or door scenes as materials and manipulated the level of processing at study and the type of distractors presented at test. We showed that for the verbal material, semantic level of processing at study results in an effective rejection of semantically inconsistent distractors. However, for the pictorial material, the perceptual level of processing leads to an effective rejection of perceptually inconsistent distractors. For targets, the effect of levels of processing was observed for words but not for pictures. The results suggest that retrieval monitoring mechanisms depend on interactions between encoding orientation, study materials, and differentiating features of distractors.

show abstract

An ERP study of multidimensional source retrieval in depression

Barrick

Dillon

2018

Biological Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We collected event-related potentials (ERPs) from 24 unmedicated adults with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and 24 controls during source memory retrieval. Words were encoded on the left or right during animacy and mobility judgments. Mobility judgments were slower than animacy judgments, suggesting deeper encoding. Participants then recalled the encoding judgment (Question cue) and position (Side cue) for each word. Depressed adults, but not controls, showed better accuracy for words from the mobility task presented under the Question vs. Side Cue. Furthermore, depressed adults showed larger left parietal ERPs to words from the mobility task presented under the Question vs. the Side Cue from 400 to 800 ms and 800-1400 ms. This ERP effect was negatively correlated with sleep quality. Thus, deep encoding followed by retrieval of the encoding judgment supported memory in MDD and augmented left parietal ERPs that have been linked to recollection and that appear sensitive to sleep disturbance.

show abstract

Retrieval constraints on the front end create differences in recollection on a subsequent test

Cited by 30 publications

References 30 publications

Source-constrained retrieval influences the encoding of new information

Source-constrained retrieval influences the encoding of new information

Closing the door to false memory: the effects of levels-of-processing and stimulus type on the rejection of perceptually vs. semantically dissimilar distractors

An ERP study of multidimensional source retrieval in depression

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About