2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.12.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retrievable Inferior vena cava filters in pregnancy: Risk versus benefit?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Examining the maternal factors in this case, VTE disease is known to affect women in pregnancy and the puerperium approximately 10 times more frequently when compared to an age-matched non-pregnant cohort of women [13]. The treatment of recurrent VTE disease in pregnancy is complex and debated, with some authors recommending retrievable filters over permanent filters given the age profile of the pregnant woman coupled with limited available follow-up data for this cohort [14]. Given the paucity of research in this area, treatment is still largely experimental and needs further investigation, potentially in the setting of a randomised controlled trial; however both the feasibility and ethical acceptability of this would make this difficult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examining the maternal factors in this case, VTE disease is known to affect women in pregnancy and the puerperium approximately 10 times more frequently when compared to an age-matched non-pregnant cohort of women [13]. The treatment of recurrent VTE disease in pregnancy is complex and debated, with some authors recommending retrievable filters over permanent filters given the age profile of the pregnant woman coupled with limited available follow-up data for this cohort [14]. Given the paucity of research in this area, treatment is still largely experimental and needs further investigation, potentially in the setting of a randomised controlled trial; however both the feasibility and ethical acceptability of this would make this difficult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,141,142,144,145 Experience with the use of inferior vena cava filters during pregnancy is limited. 164,165 There are concerns that the risk of filter migration, vena cava perforation, and failure of retrieval may be increased in this patient population, 164 although some report a similar risk of complications as in the nonpregnant population. 165 Retrievable filters are preferred in this population.…”
Section: Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3]5 If indicated, guidelines recommend the use of temporary retrievable IVC filters that are designed and intended to be removed after a short period of time, over the use of permanent non-retrievable filters. 4 Complications of IVC filters have been reported in 7-22% of the non-pregnant population 6,7 and in 9-42% of patients who had an IVC filter inserted during pregnancy. [7][8][9] Acute complications after IVC filter insertion include access site thrombosis (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Complications of IVC filters have been reported in 7-22% of the non-pregnant population 6,7 and in 9-42% of patients who had an IVC filter inserted during pregnancy. [7][8][9] Acute complications after IVC filter insertion include access site thrombosis (i.e. iliac vein thrombosis), infection, bleeding and perforation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation