2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12880-020-00454-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retraction Note: Ultrasound versus temporal artery biopsy in patients with Giant cell arteritis: a prospective cohort study

Abstract: An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Superficial temporal artery biopsy is found throughout the literature as the gold standard for confirming the diagnosis. However, its sensitivity varies between 39% and 91% given that involvement is segmental and prior glucocorticoid treatment can result in a high number of false negative results [7] . As part of the search for new, less invasive diagnostic options with high sensitivity, the European League Against Rheumatism, in its latest release, recommends Doppler ultrasound as the first imaging study of choice when temporal arteritis is suspected, avoiding the need for biopsy [5] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Superficial temporal artery biopsy is found throughout the literature as the gold standard for confirming the diagnosis. However, its sensitivity varies between 39% and 91% given that involvement is segmental and prior glucocorticoid treatment can result in a high number of false negative results [7] . As part of the search for new, less invasive diagnostic options with high sensitivity, the European League Against Rheumatism, in its latest release, recommends Doppler ultrasound as the first imaging study of choice when temporal arteritis is suspected, avoiding the need for biopsy [5] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%