2020
DOI: 10.1039/d0py90010a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retraction: A multifunctional self-dissociative polyethyleneimine derivative coating polymer for enhancing the gene transfection efficiency of DNA/polyethyleneimine polyplexes in vitro and in vivo

Abstract: Retraction of ‘A multifunctional self-dissociative polyethyleneimine derivative coating polymer for enhancing the gene transfection efficiency of DNA/polyethyleneimine polyplexes in vitro and in vivo’ by Cheng Wang, et al., Polym. Chem., 2015, 6, 780–796.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, body weight variations of mice in different groups also revealed some interesting results. As shown in Figure 6(B), no significant decline in body weight was observed in CM/SLN/ICG group, suggesting that the preferable tumour homing of CM/ SLN/ICG could increase its anticancer efficacy while reducing the undesired toxic effects [43]. In contrast, the untargeted distribution of SLN/ICG caused systematic toxicity to mice which was reflected by the time-dependent decrease in body weight.…”
Section: In Vivo Study Of the Antitumour Abilitymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Moreover, body weight variations of mice in different groups also revealed some interesting results. As shown in Figure 6(B), no significant decline in body weight was observed in CM/SLN/ICG group, suggesting that the preferable tumour homing of CM/ SLN/ICG could increase its anticancer efficacy while reducing the undesired toxic effects [43]. In contrast, the untargeted distribution of SLN/ICG caused systematic toxicity to mice which was reflected by the time-dependent decrease in body weight.…”
Section: In Vivo Study Of the Antitumour Abilitymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…These results were consistent with the previous report that positively-charged DDSs can preferably be captured by the liver, while negatively-charged ones can reduce this dilemma. 23 These results indicated that LDL/SLN/Adr had stronger tumor-targeting ability than ASLN/Adr and that it showed preferable accumulation at the tumor tissue. They showed that LDL/SLN/Adr can act as a safe and effective DDS that delivers its payload to the targeted cells and achieves better anticancer effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The negatively-charged surface, according to the previous report, might be beneficial for the ability of the DDSs to bypass the recognition of many active components within the circulation system, and might ensure safe delivery of the drugs. 23 Due to their large surface area and pore volume, SLNs were capable of loading a variety of drugs, ranging from hydrophobic ones to hydrophilic ones, with a relatively high loading efficiency. This is beneficial for SLNs to act as a co-delivery carrier for the loading of Adr.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well recognized that nanoparticles with negative surface charge could be more favorable than their positively charged counterparts in circulation, since the majority of plasma proteins in the blood stream are negatively charged. 29 As a result, upon being introduced into the circulation, the positively charged nanoparticles would be recognized and retarded by the abundant plasma proteins due to electrostatic interaction between reverse-charged particles, which could have disappointing results due to the fact that these nanoparticles cannot travel far or long enough to satisfy the minimal requirement of drug delivery. 31 In our study, the components of the as-prepared nanoparticles were mostly negatively charged lipids that finally resulted in the formation of negatively charged-NLC.…”
Section: Results and Discussion Characterization Of Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The in vivo tumor targeting efficacy and biodistribution of DiR-loaded LDNLC was evaluated using In Vivo Imaging System (FXPRO; Kodak, NY, USA) equipped with DiR filter sets (excitation/emission, 720/790 nm). 29 The in vivo plasma pharmacokinetic and DOX biodistribution studies were performed according to a previous report. 15 In brief, female BALB/c nude mice were randomly divided into two groups (n = 3), and intravenously injected with free DOX or LDNLC (DOX dosage: 5 mg/kg).…”
Section: In Vivo Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%