2017
DOI: 10.3390/en10101643
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RETRACTED: Techno-Economic Comparison of Onshore and Offshore Underground Coal Gasification End-Product Competitiveness

Abstract: Underground Coal Gasification (UCG) enables the utilisation of coal reserves that are currently not economically exploitable due to complex geological boundary conditions. Hereby, UCG produces a high-calorific synthesis gas that can be used for generation of electricity, fuels and chemical feedstock. The present study aims to identify economically competitive, site-specific end-use options for onshore and offshore produced UCG synthesis gas, taking into account the capture and storage (CCS) and/or utilisation … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, in situ coal conversion generates signifi- cantly smaller volumes of waste products (e.g., fly ashes) as well as pollutants, and moreover induces lower dust pollution, water consumption and methane emissions into the atmosphere. Coupled with existing technologies for carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) or even CO 2 utilisation to produce chemical feedstock such as methanol, in situ coal conversion has the potential to recover energy from coal with a low CO 2 footprint (Roddy and Younger, 2010;Sarhosis et al, 2013;Nakaten and Kempka, 2019).…”
Section: Formation Of By-products During In Situ Coal Conversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, in situ coal conversion generates signifi- cantly smaller volumes of waste products (e.g., fly ashes) as well as pollutants, and moreover induces lower dust pollution, water consumption and methane emissions into the atmosphere. Coupled with existing technologies for carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) or even CO 2 utilisation to produce chemical feedstock such as methanol, in situ coal conversion has the potential to recover energy from coal with a low CO 2 footprint (Roddy and Younger, 2010;Sarhosis et al, 2013;Nakaten and Kempka, 2019).…”
Section: Formation Of By-products During In Situ Coal Conversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the process of gasification, the gasification area is gradually enlarged along the linking hole. The product gases can be obtained, as they are useful in the creation of many products, such as chemical feed stocks, liquid fuels, hydrogen, synthetic gas, and the generation of electric power [17][18][19][20][21][22]. Recently, UCG technology has attracted greater attention as an alternative to conventional mining methods, especially when exploiting coal resources located deep underground or exploiting low quality coal resources with high ash and high sulfur.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ERWs are commonly drilled in offshore projects where large oil and gas reservoirs areas are drained from one or more platforms. This can minimize environmental impacts and field-development costs by reducing drilling sites or offshore platforms [8][9][10]. ERWs can be drilled from one platform to reach reservoirs at a great distance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%