2007
DOI: 10.1016/s1001-0742(07)60086-2
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RETRACTED: Supercritical water oxidation for the destruction of toxic organic wastewaters: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The combination of both factors points out the most promising option regarding the GWP parameter. It is to be highlighted that, specifically, SCWO is widely proposed as an environmentally friendly alternative to incineration (Veriansyah and Kim, 2007;Boachen et al, 2009;, which is a fact that has been shown and strongly confirmed in this work through the NovEDAR_EDSS software. With a sludge residence time of a few seconds, SCWO is able to remove more than 99% of the organic matter releasing the following major products: water, CO 2 and inorganic solids [which could also be further exploited to recover phosphorous (Stark et al, 2006) and even precious metals (Matthey, 2003); however, although this valuable production has not been taken into account in this work, since it is novel and far from being implemented as a common procedure related to SCWO].…”
Section: Global Warming Potential (Gwp) Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The combination of both factors points out the most promising option regarding the GWP parameter. It is to be highlighted that, specifically, SCWO is widely proposed as an environmentally friendly alternative to incineration (Veriansyah and Kim, 2007;Boachen et al, 2009;, which is a fact that has been shown and strongly confirmed in this work through the NovEDAR_EDSS software. With a sludge residence time of a few seconds, SCWO is able to remove more than 99% of the organic matter releasing the following major products: water, CO 2 and inorganic solids [which could also be further exploited to recover phosphorous (Stark et al, 2006) and even precious metals (Matthey, 2003); however, although this valuable production has not been taken into account in this work, since it is novel and far from being implemented as a common procedure related to SCWO].…”
Section: Global Warming Potential (Gwp) Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Currently, for wastewater containing more than 1% EDA, controlled incineration was usually adopted as the major treatment method. To attain high destruction efficiency, incineration must be operated at very high temperature (900-1100 ℃), which means high cost [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supercritical water oxidation (SCWO) is a very effective way to degrade organic pollutants because most organic pollutants and oxidants can dissolve in supercritical water to form a homogeneous phase [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Although SCWO shows great potential in degradation of organic pollutants, many problems such as deposition of salts, corrosion, and the high temperature and pressure of the critical point of 647 K and 22.1 MPa cause it very difficult to be applied to industrial utilization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%