RETRACTED: Standards for ensuring the legality of covert activities in criminal proceedings through the prism of European Court of Human Rights

Kaplina, O. V.; Tumaniants, A.R.; Kritskaya, I. O.

doi:10.52468/2542-1514.2022.6(2).189-203

Law Enforcement Review

2022

DOI: 10.52468/2542-1514.2022.6(2).189-203

|View full text |Cite|

RETRACTED: Standards for ensuring the legality of covert activities in criminal proceedings through the prism of European Court of Human Rights

O. V. Kaplina¹,

A.R. Tumaniants²,

I. O. Kritskaya³

Abstract: Информация о статьеДата поступления -25 февраля 2021 г. Дата принятия в печать -11 февраля 2022 г. Дата онлайн-размещения -20 июня 2022 г. Ключевые слова Уголовный процесс, досудебное расследование, негласная деятельность, негласные следственные действия, оперативно-розыскная деятельность, следственные действия, правовая позиция Европейского Суда по правам человека, компаративный анализ Анализируются правовые позиции Европейского Суда по правам человека, касающиеся процессуального порядка проведения негласных … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Substantiating the legality of human rights restrictions in Ukraine in pre-trial investigation

Hloviuk,

Zavtur,

Zinkovskyy

et al. 2024

SLS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The relevance of the subject lies in the formation of a scientifically based concept of proving the legality of restrictions on rights and freedoms during pre-trial investigation, which is based on a three-stage test of the justification of interference formulated in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. The purpose of the study was to establish general criteria for the legality of restriction of rights and freedoms during pre-trial investigation with their explication of specific procedural actions and decisions characterised by a high degree of intrusiveness. The main research methods were anthropological, axiological, dialectical, systemic, formal, legal, and the method of expert assessments. Was is proved that algorithmisation of the decision on the restriction of human rights in a pre-trial investigation should be conducted according to the methodology of a three-part test: foresight in the law; the purpose of interference, which should be legitimate; whether such interference was required in a democratic society. This test is applicable to all intrusive measures in criminal proceedings but has its own characteristics depending on the measure and the nature of the intensity of restriction of rights. It is argued that the elements of the three-part test when applying measures to ensure criminal proceedings are objectified in the local subject of proof, which has three levels: 1) General (Article 132 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine); 2) Group, for preventive measures; 3) Special, for certain measures to ensure criminal proceedings, including preventive measures. On the example of regulatory regulation of individual investigative (search) actions, it is established that ensuring the proportionality of their application is conducted by determining by the investigating judge the limits of restriction of rights and freedoms during such a procedural action and preventing arbitrariness to a person. The most detailed proof of the legality of restricting rights in measures to ensure criminal proceedings has specifics depending on the measure and the person to whom it is applied. The practical importance of the work lies in the possibility of using the algorithms given in it when establishing elements of the local subject of proof by investigating judges

show abstract

Substantiating the legality of human rights restrictions in Ukraine in pre-trial investigation

Hloviuk,

Zavtur,

Zinkovskyy

et al. 2024

SLS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

hi@scite.ai

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

RETRACTED: Standards for ensuring the legality of covert activities in criminal proceedings through the prism of European Court of Human Rights

Cited by 1 publication

References 6 publications

Substantiating the legality of human rights restrictions in Ukraine in pre-trial investigation

Substantiating the legality of human rights restrictions in Ukraine in pre-trial investigation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About