2021
DOI: 10.1155/2021/1345974
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

[Retracted] Remote Judgment Method of Painting Image Style Plagiarism Based on Wireless Network Multitask Learning

Abstract: Since the artistry of the work cannot be accurately described, the identification of reproducible plagiarism is more difficult. The identification of reproducible plagiarism of digital image works requires in-depth research on the artistry of artistic works. In this paper, a remote judgment method for plagiarism of painting image style based on wireless network multitask learning is proposed. According to this new method, the uncertainty of painting image samples is removed based on multitask learning algorith… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Painting plagiarism often refers to copying or reusing the content and style of existing works (Wang, 2021). Frequent examples of painting plagiarism include adjusting the color, angle, size, shape, and relative position of the main content in the painting and rebuilding other objects using the main content of existing works.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Painting plagiarism often refers to copying or reusing the content and style of existing works (Wang, 2021). Frequent examples of painting plagiarism include adjusting the color, angle, size, shape, and relative position of the main content in the painting and rebuilding other objects using the main content of existing works.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%