2021
DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13652
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retracted: Misoprostol versus expectant management in women with incomplete first‐trimester miscarriage after failed primary misoprostol treatment: A randomized clinical trial

Abstract: Objective To compare the effectiveness and safety of repeat misoprostol versus expectant management in women with first‐trimester incomplete miscarriage who have been initially treated with misoprostol. Methods The study was an open‐labeled randomized controlled trial including women with an incomplete first‐trimester miscarriage after administration of misoprostol. The participants were randomly assigned to vaginal misoprostol or expectant management using a computer‐generated table of random numbers. The pri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The history of one or more cesarean sections led to signi cantly more failure in medical treatment (p = 0.001). This is con rmed by a recent RCT from 2021 [23] stating that history of cesarean sections lead to more failure in treatment. Correspondingly a recent study from 2022 [24] examined predictive parameters to failure in treatment with Misoprostol in women with one or more cesarean sections in the past.…”
Section: Page 4/6mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The history of one or more cesarean sections led to signi cantly more failure in medical treatment (p = 0.001). This is con rmed by a recent RCT from 2021 [23] stating that history of cesarean sections lead to more failure in treatment. Correspondingly a recent study from 2022 [24] examined predictive parameters to failure in treatment with Misoprostol in women with one or more cesarean sections in the past.…”
Section: Page 4/6mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…[ 15 ] A recent study suggested that a previous cesarean section (odds ratio [OR]: 5.15, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15–23.05, P = .032) was a significant predictor for incomplete miscarriage. [ 16 ] Nevertheless, clinical factors that could be predictive of successful medical treatment for EPL within the specific study population who had previous cesarean deliveries were not investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%