2022
DOI: 10.1155/2022/4604223
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

[Retracted] Knowledge Graph Analysis of Digital Emergency Management Research Based on CiteSpace Visualisation: Comparative Analysis of WOS and CNKI Databases

Abstract: Facing the dual background of risk society and the fourth scientific and technological revolution, digital emergency management (DEM) research has attracted wide attention worldwide. Based on the comparative analysis of data from Web of Science (WOS) and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases, the research draws the knowledge map by CiteSpace, in order to analyse the spatiotemporal distribution, hotspots, and trends of DEM research. The following are the results: (1) DEM research shows a spir… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It also boasts the best digital library technology in the world. (Nan et al, 2022). It allows for the sharing and dissemination of China's vast knowledge and information resources in addition to promoting Chinese education and scientific research to raise institutions to a high international level (Sun & Asmawi, 2022).…”
Section: Data Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also boasts the best digital library technology in the world. (Nan et al, 2022). It allows for the sharing and dissemination of China's vast knowledge and information resources in addition to promoting Chinese education and scientific research to raise institutions to a high international level (Sun & Asmawi, 2022).…”
Section: Data Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tis article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. Tis investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%