2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2014.09.009
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RETRACTED: Genotoxicity assessment of cerium oxide nanoparticles in female Wistar rats after acute oral exposure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
36
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
4
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we did not test systemic genotoxicity in our study, the absent effects reported by Cordelli et al [18] indicate a restriction of effects to pulmonary organs. In contrast, systemic genotoxic effects were reported after single and repeated oral administration of CeO 2 [49, 50]. Considering that respective findings were present only at high concentrations of >300 mg/kg BW, a potential for the induction of DNA damage via secondary rather than primary genotoxic mechanisms could be assumed for CeO 2 nanoparticles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we did not test systemic genotoxicity in our study, the absent effects reported by Cordelli et al [18] indicate a restriction of effects to pulmonary organs. In contrast, systemic genotoxic effects were reported after single and repeated oral administration of CeO 2 [49, 50]. Considering that respective findings were present only at high concentrations of >300 mg/kg BW, a potential for the induction of DNA damage via secondary rather than primary genotoxic mechanisms could be assumed for CeO 2 nanoparticles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also likely that the DNA damage results from the inflammation and/or oxidative stress which took place in the different organs studied. It has been reported that oral administration of high dose (1000 mg/kg bw) of CeO 2 NPs induces significant DNA damage in peripheral blood leukocytes and liver cells, micronucleus formation in bone marrow and blood cells, and total cytogenetic changes in bone marrow [58]. Moreover, it has been shown that CeO 2 NPs induce oxidative stress and genotoxicity in human skin melanoma cells and human dermal fibroblasts [59, 60].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the exposure to the same doses of CeO 2 micro materials resulted in no significant translocation or material accumulation in any tissue. The data above indicated that size and dose are very important contributors to secondary tissue bio-accumulation for the CeO 2 NMs after acute oral exposure (Kumari et al 2014b). …”
Section: Nm-induced Adverse Effects In Secondary Organsmentioning
confidence: 97%