2020
DOI: 10.1155/2020/5352427
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

[Retracted] Effective Remediation Strategy for Xenobiotic Zoxamide by Pure Bacterial Strains, Escherichia coli, Streptococcus pyogenes, and Streptococcus pneumoniae

Abstract: Zoxamide, a class IV hazardous fungicide, is perilous for the environment due to its highly persistent nature. Up till the current date, there are no reports on the biodegradation of zoxamide. The scarcity of knowledge in this domain led to the present research to evaluate the biodegradation of this benzamide fungicide by three bacterial strains, Escherichia coli (EC), Streptococcus pyogenes (SPy), and Streptococcus pneumoniae (SP). Biotransformation of zoxamide was scrutinized in nutrient broth assemblies for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is one of the best microbes for aromatic compound catabolism, both biochemically and genetically. Previous research has shown that it has its collection of genes and enzymes for the metabolism of aromatic molecules [33]. EC has previously been described to degrade pesticides.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is one of the best microbes for aromatic compound catabolism, both biochemically and genetically. Previous research has shown that it has its collection of genes and enzymes for the metabolism of aromatic molecules [33]. EC has previously been described to degrade pesticides.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [ 1 ]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process: Discrepancies in scope Discrepancies in the description of the research reported Discrepancies between the availability of data and the research described Inappropriate citations Incoherent, meaningless and/or irrelevant content included in the article Manipulated or compromised peer review …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%