2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12144-022-03825-1
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RETRACTED ARTICLE: The effect of corrective feedback from female teachers on formative assessments: educational resilience, educational belongingness, and academic procrastination in an English language course

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They found that the project-based method improved academic performance, but this occurred primarily in the group of students with low levels of academic procrastination. From the same perspective, Dong and Izadpanah [ 35 ] compared the effect of corrective feedback after formative feedback in an experimental group with control group (women), obtaining improvement in academic resilience, educational belonging, and reduction in procrastination compared to the control group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They found that the project-based method improved academic performance, but this occurred primarily in the group of students with low levels of academic procrastination. From the same perspective, Dong and Izadpanah [ 35 ] compared the effect of corrective feedback after formative feedback in an experimental group with control group (women), obtaining improvement in academic resilience, educational belonging, and reduction in procrastination compared to the control group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…= 1509); out of these, 8.86% were primary school students (participants in seven studies) and the rest, 91.14%, were secondary school students. In total, five of the studies analyzed had all-girl samples, e.g., [35][36][37][38][39] and one of them was aimed at studying academic procrastination in girls with learning disabilities, e.g., [38] (see Figure 4 for details). A comparison is made between the initially retrieved publications and the documents finally included.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%