[Retracted] Analysis of the Path and Relationship between Movement‐Style Environmental Governance and Political Potential Energy Integration and Isomorphic Transformation

Abstract

As a theoretical research framework for analyzing the governance of China, political potential energy is a concept with local discourse characteristics. Political potential energy highlights the comprehensive leadership ability of the Chinese Communist Party in the ruling process. It has profound political and dynamic connotations, and it is reflected in all aspects of the Chinese Communist Party’s governance. The linkage logic between movement-style environmental governance and political potential energy suggests that the gathering of political potential energy and scientific placement are crucial. Political potential energy needs to be supported by certain rules and systems, and local autonomy must be fully respected. Therefore, by exploring the relationship between movement-style governance and political potential energy and the path of homogeneous transformation, these issues are worth exploring, which are related to the major theme of national governance capacity and governance system modernization.

Retracted: Analysis of the Path and Relationship between Movement-Style Environmental Governance and Political Potential Energy Integration and Isomorphic Transformation

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [ 1 ]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process: Discrepancies in scope Discrepancies in the description of the research reported Discrepancies between the availability of data and the research described Inappropriate citations Incoherent, meaningless and/or irrelevant content included in the article Peer-review manipulation …”

“…Tis article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. Tis investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process:…”