[Retracted] Analysis of the Correlation between Football Education Environment and Students’ Psychology Health Based on Gauss Characteristics

Abstract

Campus football has become a core content of school physical education. Through football education, we can cultivate students’ sound personality and promote students’ all-round physical and mental development. At the same time, through psychological skills training methods, we can enrich the educational methods of football skills and provide theoretical reference for promoting educational reform. On the basis of Gaussian features, this paper combines the mixed Gaussian feature model to further describe the relationship between football education and students’ psychology. At the same time, Apriori association rule algorithm in data mining is introduced, and Apriori algorithm is improved in parallel with Hadoop data processing platform. Several parallel association rule algorithms are emphatically studied and analyzed to strengthen the analysis of the relationship between football education and students’ psychology. The results show that the average recognition rate of the correlation between football education and students’ psychology based on Gaussian features is 17.91% higher than that of ordinary results, which obviously improves the correlation recognition result and has a good descriptive ability. Therefore, it has become an important issue for today’s physical education workers to analyze the correlation between football education and students’ psychology in order to cultivate students’ sports and mental health.

Retracted: Analysis of the Correlation between Football Education Environment and Students’ Psychology Health Based on Gauss Characteristics

“…Tis article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. Tis investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process:…”

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [ 1 ]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process: Discrepancies in scope Discrepancies in the description of the research reported Discrepancies between the availability of data and the research described Inappropriate citations Incoherent, meaningless and/or irrelevant content included in the article Peer-review manipulation …”