[Retracted] Analysis of Network Resources Integration of Political Thought Courses in Institution of Higher Learning Based on Collaborative Education Environment

Abstract

The importance of political thought courses in higher education institutions is directly related to the caliber and extent of staff development. This essay carefully examines and discusses the integration of network resources for political thought courses in higher education institutions from the standpoint of collaborative education. This article analyses the current state of the integration of network resources into higher education institutions’ political thought curricula. The general DM process and DM-related technologies are studied concurrently. The mining model based on the study of political thought course is chosen in conjunction with this course. Additionally, a teaching resource integration method based on the idea of collaborative learning is developed, including the development of an Arduino device identification program based on NN and an Arduino device learning resource base. In accordance with the design of the network resource integration method used in the political thought course, the article evaluates the model’s performance in a number of different areas. The proposed algorithm’s accuracy is 95.11 percent, according to experiments. The recall rate of this algorithm can also go as high as 93.94 percent. In order to further reform teaching and raise the standard of learning, this study can offer students learning direction.

Retracted: Analysis of Network Resources Integration of Political Thought Courses in Institution of Higher Learning Based on Collaborative Education Environment

“…Tis article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. Tis investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process:…”

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [ 1 ]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process: Discrepancies in scope Discrepancies in the description of the research reported Discrepancies between the availability of data and the research described Inappropriate citations Incoherent, meaningless and/or irrelevant content included in the article Peer-review manipulation …”