2020
DOI: 10.1177/0020720920940578
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RETRACTED: A novel rough-wall model for large eddy simulation of high-Reynolds-number flow

Abstract: This study develops a novel rough-wall model for large eddy simulation (LES) based on recent work on wall-modelled LES. This approach is capable of solving for the basic flow character over a rough wall at high Reynolds numbers without resolving the details of the roughness elements. The wall-modelled LES approach on a smooth wall is proven to be sufficiently precise to predict the velocity profile and wall shear stress. The average roughness shear stress can be combined with the smooth-wall shear stress in th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 At present, large eddy simulation (LES), detached eddy simulation (DES) and Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes/Large Eddy Simulation (RANS/LES) are common calculation methods applied for the supersonic flow field and aerodynamic noise. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] However, for high Reynolds number flows, the calculation cost of the above methods is still very high. For the RANS/LES, it particularly dependent on the subgrid scale model dissipation, meanwhile, there are difficulties in transferring the data of statistical turbulence energy from RANS to LES, and all of these make this approach expensive and uncertain for the supersonic aerodynamic noise computation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 At present, large eddy simulation (LES), detached eddy simulation (DES) and Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes/Large Eddy Simulation (RANS/LES) are common calculation methods applied for the supersonic flow field and aerodynamic noise. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] However, for high Reynolds number flows, the calculation cost of the above methods is still very high. For the RANS/LES, it particularly dependent on the subgrid scale model dissipation, meanwhile, there are difficulties in transferring the data of statistical turbulence energy from RANS to LES, and all of these make this approach expensive and uncertain for the supersonic aerodynamic noise computation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%