2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-91493-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RetiNerveNet: using recursive deep learning to estimate pointwise 24-2 visual field data based on retinal structure

Abstract: Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness in the world, affecting over 70 million people. The cumbersome Standard Automated Perimetry (SAP) test is most frequently used to detect visual loss due to glaucoma. Due to the SAP test’s innate difficulty and its high test-retest variability, we propose the RetiNerveNet, a deep convolutional recursive neural network for obtaining estimates of the SAP visual field. RetiNerveNet uses information from the more objective Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With a similar approach, Datta et al developed a recurrent neural network (RNN) that analyzed the circumpapillary RNFL thickness, but used anatomic knowledge to improve predictions. 14 Their results were similar to those described by Mariottoni and colleagues.…”
Section: Prediction Of 24-2 Visual Field Sensitivity Threshold Valuessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…With a similar approach, Datta et al developed a recurrent neural network (RNN) that analyzed the circumpapillary RNFL thickness, but used anatomic knowledge to improve predictions. 14 Their results were similar to those described by Mariottoni and colleagues.…”
Section: Prediction Of 24-2 Visual Field Sensitivity Threshold Valuessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Other lines of research may study different layers and may also have different devices and methods to measure RT and VF. For example, Park et al 13 studied GCIPL and RNFL that were measured in a different way from our data, and Datta et al 14 only studied RNFL.…”
Section: Glaucoma Estimationmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Various studies focused on predicting threshold sensitivity values in 24-2 standard automated perimetry from segmented OCT images. [24][25][26][27][28] While the majority of these studies used SD-OCT imaging, Park et al used swept-source OCT images, and the root mean squared error of the global prediction error for their model was 4.44 dB. 25 images to predict each of the 52 sensitivity points on the 24-2 VF, and their model had an MAE of 0.485 (0.438-0.533).…”
Section: Glaucomamentioning
confidence: 99%