1968
DOI: 10.1159/000125521
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retinal Projections of <i>Tupaia Glis</i>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This fact is consistent with the observations of Laemle (1968), who reported that the retino-collicular afferent fibers penetrate into the lateral portion of the superior colliculus. Most of these fibers go through the optic layer and they are distributed, afterwards, to the rest of the layers.…”
Section: Superior Colliculussupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This fact is consistent with the observations of Laemle (1968), who reported that the retino-collicular afferent fibers penetrate into the lateral portion of the superior colliculus. Most of these fibers go through the optic layer and they are distributed, afterwards, to the rest of the layers.…”
Section: Superior Colliculussupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Tupaia is diurnal and possesses a well-developed visual system reflecting an active life swinging in trees of the rain forest. Its oculomotor system also includes an extraordinarily well developed AOS including all the fiber tracts and nuclear components described by Hayhow et al (see Campbell et al, 1967;Laemle, 1968).…”
Section: Nonmammalian Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This fact provides an opportunity to compare the development of interlaminar spaces between layers that have segregated for presumably different functional reasons. Finally, many details of the connections, physiology, and relative cell sizes of LGN layers in the adult tree shrew are known, allowing for easy comparison of the mature and immature nucleus (Campbell et al, 1967;Carey et al, 1979;Casagrande, 1974;Casagrande et al, 1978;Casagrande and Harting, 1975;Hubel, 1975;Brauer et al, 1981;Glickstein, 1967;Harting et al, 1973;Laemle, 1968;Sherman et al, 1974;Norton et al, 1977;Tigges, 1966;Snyder and Diamond, 1968;Fitzpatrick et al, 1980;Birecree et al, 1980). In the present communication, it is our goal to define 589 the normal sequence of events leading to laminar formation in the tree shrew LGN.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%