2012
DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-302309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retinal nerve fibre layer thickness in ARSACS: myelination or hypertrophy?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However these fundoscopic appearances have been inconsistently observed in non-Québecois cases (Takiyama, 2006, Gücüyener et al, 2001, Mrissa et al, 2000, Grieco et al, 2004, Garcia-Martin et al, 2013, Vermeer et al, 2008. OCT scans in ARSACS have confirmed abnormal thickening of the RNFL (Garcia-Martin et al, 2013, Vingolo et al, 2011, Pablo et al, 2011, Desserre et al, 2011, Stevens et al, 2013, Nethisinghe et al, 2011, Gazulla et al, 2012 although one series reported a single case with peripapillary RNFL thicknesses of 86 and 111m which were within the range for unaffected controls (Yu-Wai-Man et al, 2014). Furthermore, in a previous study we reported that two unaffected individuals in a single family who were heterozygous for two different SACS mutations showed partial peripapillary RNFL thickening with a mean of thickness of 115.5m (Nethisinghe et al, 2011).…”
Section: Abbreviationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However these fundoscopic appearances have been inconsistently observed in non-Québecois cases (Takiyama, 2006, Gücüyener et al, 2001, Mrissa et al, 2000, Grieco et al, 2004, Garcia-Martin et al, 2013, Vermeer et al, 2008. OCT scans in ARSACS have confirmed abnormal thickening of the RNFL (Garcia-Martin et al, 2013, Vingolo et al, 2011, Pablo et al, 2011, Desserre et al, 2011, Stevens et al, 2013, Nethisinghe et al, 2011, Gazulla et al, 2012 although one series reported a single case with peripapillary RNFL thicknesses of 86 and 111m which were within the range for unaffected controls (Yu-Wai-Man et al, 2014). Furthermore, in a previous study we reported that two unaffected individuals in a single family who were heterozygous for two different SACS mutations showed partial peripapillary RNFL thickening with a mean of thickness of 115.5m (Nethisinghe et al, 2011).…”
Section: Abbreviationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2 A recent case report has even further argued that retinal ‘hypermyelination’ in ARSACS is a pathologically misleading term that should be abandoned in favour of retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) hypertrophy. 3 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specificity of the peripapillary RNFL thickening is 100%, but sensitivity is lower with some patients, particularly those of Japanese origin, being reported not to exhibit such peripapillary RNFL thickening, either by fundus or by OCT examination ( 4 , 5 ). OCT examination has also recently revealed an absence of the physiological foveal depression ( 7 , 11 13 ). However, despite these structural abnormalities, visual dysfunction in ARSACS (using standard tests of visual acuity, visual field, and color vision) has not been previously reported.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first report of ARSACS described “striking and markedly increased visibility of the retinal nerve fibers, mainly in the papillomacular bundle area” ( 2 ). The exact nature of the peripapillary RNFL thickening has been debated, but OCT findings suggest hypertrophy of the RNFL rather than myelination of RNFL ( 11 , 12 ). The specificity of the peripapillary RNFL thickening is 100%, but sensitivity is lower with some patients, particularly those of Japanese origin, being reported not to exhibit such peripapillary RNFL thickening, either by fundus or by OCT examination ( 4 , 5 ).…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%