2009
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2008.153460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retinal microvascular abnormalities and stroke: a systematic review

Abstract: Background: Lacunar strokes account for 25% of ischaemic strokes, but their precise aetiology is unknown. Similarities between the retinal and cerebral small vessels mean that clarification of the exact relationship between retinal microvascular abnormalities and stroke, and particularly with stroke subtypes, may aid understanding of the aetiology of lacunar stroke and stroke risk. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed by searching Medline and Embase to October 2007 for studies in humans… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
71
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
71
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…8,30 Furthermore, we showed that the addition of retinal measures significantly improves discrimination and risk stratification for stroke when compared with the models on established risk factors and hsCRP, although the absolute improvement in prediction was modest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,30 Furthermore, we showed that the addition of retinal measures significantly improves discrimination and risk stratification for stroke when compared with the models on established risk factors and hsCRP, although the absolute improvement in prediction was modest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grading results have been shown to vary with ophthalmologist, e.g., [8]. An objective, repeatable and quantitative assessment of vessel tortuosity has been long deemed desirable, as it sometimes informs important treatment decisions (e.g., ROP-plus disease [18]), and for biomarker research [19]. Several quantitative tortuosity indices and associated automatic algorithms have been proposed [9], [10], [11], [12], [17] but, due to the lack of public, large annotated datasets, ideally disease-specific, it remains very difficult to compare algorithms comprehensively and fairly [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a systematic review and two recent population-based studies in Taiwan suggest that RVO does not independently increase the risk of stroke or myocardial infarction. [24][25][26] In the Annual Evidence Update on Retinal Vein Occlusion, the National Health Service in England concluded that there is insufficient evidence to confirm that RVO is a predictor of stroke. 27 The evidence from observational studies on the impact of RVO on vascular mortality (ie, death from vascular causes) is conflicting.…”
Section: Risk Of Vascular and Cardiovascular Complications In Rvomentioning
confidence: 99%