2018 International Conference on Innovation and Intelligence for Informatics, Computing, and Technologies (3ICT) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/3ict.2018.8855784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retinal Image Laser Marks Detection using a Convolutional Neural Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results were promising of almost accuracy rate average up to 89.60 %. comparing the results with the previous study [16], the average of the accuracy was slightly dropped. The previous study came out with an accuracy average of 91.65 % with just eight layers only.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results were promising of almost accuracy rate average up to 89.60 %. comparing the results with the previous study [16], the average of the accuracy was slightly dropped. The previous study came out with an accuracy average of 91.65 % with just eight layers only.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Several experiments were conducted in this study. However, these experiments are conducting to improve the results of the previous study [16]. In this study, 13 layers were used instead of 8 layers of the previous study.…”
Section: Details Of the Experiments And Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiment results were auspicious with an average accuracy rates of 95.75% and reached to 97.95% as a top rate. This rate average is higher than the previous studies [16,17] with an average accuracy rate of 91.65% and 89.60% as shown in Table 2. However, both studies used a CNN network with 8 and 13 layers respectively and were tested on the same dataset that was used in this study for training and testing.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
“… Layer 1: As the same used dataset of previous studies [16][17], the images were sized at 227×227 pixels with level of RGB. Here, the normalization was 0 center for layer 1.…”
Section: Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation