1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(98)00272-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retinal ganglion cell dysfunction in humans following post-geniculate lesions: specific spatio–temporal losses revealed by pattern ERG

Abstract: Nasal and temporal hemifield (14 x 24 degrees) pattern electroretinograms (PERGs) were recorded in eight patients (age range: 21-72 years) suffering from different post-geniculate lesions (documented by CT scan and/or MRI of the brain) and homonymous hemianopia at visual field testing. In total eight age-matched normal subjects served as controls. PERGs were elicited by alternating, sinusoidal gratings (90% contrast), whose spatial and temporal characteristics, 6 Hz-5 c deg-1 and 15 Hz-0.58 c deg-1, were chose… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10 However, we could not differentiate whether there was trans-synaptic retrograde degeneration within the OR. 2,[27][28][29][30][31] With new imaging approaches, it was found that MS patients who had suffered ON developed abnormalities in the OR (evident by diffusion tensor imaging and tractography) 11,13,14,32 or in the cortex (assessed by magnetic transference imaging or brain spectroscopy), 12,33 even some time after focal injury, indicative of trans-synaptic damage. Previous studies in animal models have demonstrated the existence of transsynaptic degeneration after focal brain damage, [23][24][25][26] revealing the potential spreading effect of focal WM lesions along WM tracts and through networks within the brain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…10 However, we could not differentiate whether there was trans-synaptic retrograde degeneration within the OR. 2,[27][28][29][30][31] With new imaging approaches, it was found that MS patients who had suffered ON developed abnormalities in the OR (evident by diffusion tensor imaging and tractography) 11,13,14,32 or in the cortex (assessed by magnetic transference imaging or brain spectroscopy), 12,33 even some time after focal injury, indicative of trans-synaptic damage. Previous studies in animal models have demonstrated the existence of transsynaptic degeneration after focal brain damage, [23][24][25][26] revealing the potential spreading effect of focal WM lesions along WM tracts and through networks within the brain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a phenomenon has also been studied in the human visual pathway after focal damage of a different nature in either the visual cortex or optic nerve, providing evidence of trans-synaptic degeneration between the anterior and posterior visual pathway. 2,[27][28][29][30][31] With new imaging approaches, it was found that MS patients who had suffered ON developed abnormalities in the OR (evident by diffusion tensor imaging and tractography) 11,13,14,32 or in the cortex (assessed by magnetic transference imaging or brain spectroscopy), 12,33 even some time after focal injury, indicative of trans-synaptic damage. Our study is consistent with these previous findings, entering into more detail by allowing retrograde and anterograde damage to be assessed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18,19 New evidence rose to light with pattern-evoked electroretinogram studies in the 1990s that found differences in signal strength between the two hemiretinas of homonymous hemianopic patients. 20,21 More recently, resource to high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging revealed optic tract thinning in hemianopic patients. 22 The development of OCT technology allowed for an easy and non-invasive analysis of the retina and the optic disc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first report of abnormal PERGs in a hemianopic patient was provided by Stoerig & Zrenner [16] who found differences both between the two hemiretinae of the patient and in comparison to a sighted control subject. This finding was strengthened by a larger study by Porrello & Falsini [17] of eight hemianopic patients (6 right hemisphere damages). They not only found a significant difference between affected and unaffected hemiretinae in the patients, but also that the loss in signal correlated with the time since the lesion.…”
Section: Electroretinogram In Human Homonymous Hemianopiamentioning
confidence: 78%