2005
DOI: 10.1242/dev.02096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retinal ganglion cell-derived sonic hedgehog locally controls proliferation and the timing of RGC development in the embryonic mouse retina

Abstract: The timing of cell cycle exit and temporal changes in the developmental competence of precursor cells are key components for the establishment of the normal complement of cell types in the mammalian retina. The identity of cell extrinsic cues that control these processes is largely unknown. We showed previously in mouse retina that sonic hedgehog (Shh) signalling from retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) to retinal precursor cells (RPC) is required for the establishment of normal retinal organization. Here, we show t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
170
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(188 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
16
170
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be accomplished by differential activation of cell surface receptors associated with the cell body and/or differential effects on gene regulation within the nucleus. Potential neurogenicmodulating factors include retinal ganglion cell secreted Sonic hedgehog (Shh) and Gliaderived Factor 11 (Gdf11) (Locker et al, 2006;Wang et al, 2005;Kim et al, 2005). Alternatively, differences in nuclear position and the organelles associated with the nucleus may enable differential shuttling/post-translational modifications of fate-determinants, which then affect neurogenesis and mediate differentiation among progenitors cells.…”
Section: A Model For Interkinetic Nuclear Migration and Cell Fate DIVmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be accomplished by differential activation of cell surface receptors associated with the cell body and/or differential effects on gene regulation within the nucleus. Potential neurogenicmodulating factors include retinal ganglion cell secreted Sonic hedgehog (Shh) and Gliaderived Factor 11 (Gdf11) (Locker et al, 2006;Wang et al, 2005;Kim et al, 2005). Alternatively, differences in nuclear position and the organelles associated with the nucleus may enable differential shuttling/post-translational modifications of fate-determinants, which then affect neurogenesis and mediate differentiation among progenitors cells.…”
Section: A Model For Interkinetic Nuclear Migration and Cell Fate DIVmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other examples of Hh regulating proliferation and cell death are illustrated in studies on different types of cancer (Qualtrough et al, 2004;Romer et al, 2004;Sanchez et al, 2004;Sanchez and Ruiz i Altaba, 2005). Likewise, Hh signaling is also involved in progenitor cell proliferation and survival during eye development in several different organisms (Stenkamp et al, 2002, and reviewed in Amato et al, 2004Wang et al, 2005). Shh has also been implicated in controlling proliferation during regenerative processes.…”
Section: Regeneration Stimulated By Fgf2 Requires Basal Levels Of Hh mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a role for Hh signaling in progenitor cell maintenance has been shown in the developing retina where conditional ablation of Shh in mouse retinas led to a reduction of the retina progenitor (precursor) cell pool (Wang et al, 2005). One of the best examples of Hh signaling specifying and maintaining the identity of neural progenitors takes place during neurogenesis where Shh regulates progenitor cell identity and neuronal fate in the ventral neural tube and developing spinal cord (Ericson et al, 1996(Ericson et al, , 1997Briscoe et al, 2000;Agius et al, 2004).…”
Section: Maintenance Of Retinal Progenitor Cell Markers In the Cb/cmzmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, when RPCs are plated at clonal density, they generate clones that are of similar size and composition as clones that develop in situ, and the general order of cell type production in the population is reproduced (Cayouette et al, 2003). Although feedback inhibition signals from the environment can clearly influence the proportion of specific cell types produced (Reh and Tully, 1986;Reh, 1992;Waid and McLoon, 1998;Wang et al, 2005), even in clonal cultures, these results are consistent with a model in which RPCs do not require specific instructive environmental signals for proper cell fate specification, but rather depend on cell intrinsic cues acting to bias their developmental potential over time (Cayouette et al, 2006;Gomes et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%