2017 10th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, BioMedical Engineering and Informatics (CISP-BMEI) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/cisp-bmei.2017.8302199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retinal blood vessel segmentation based on the Gaussian matched filter and U-net

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen from the table that the accuracy, specificity and AUC of the proposed method are all higher than those of the other listed methods, reaching 96.83, 98.97 and 0.9830%, respectively. In terms of accuracy, the second highest comparison reaches 96.36% in [23], which is still 0.47% lower than that of the proposed method, and its other three indexes are 2.64, 0.21, 0.0058% lower than that of the proposed method, respectively; in terms of sensitivity, the highest comparison reaches 80.78% in [24], which is 0.12% higher than that of the proposed method, but its accuracy and specificity are 2.14 and 2.23% lower than that of the proposed method, respectively; in terms of specificity, the second highest comparison reaches 98.94% in [25], which is just 0.03% lower than that of the proposed method, and its accuracy and sensitivity are 1.81 and 6.56% lower than that of the proposed method, respectively; in terms of AUC, the second highest comparison reaches 0.9800 in [26], which is 0.0030 lower than that of the proposed method, and its other three indexes are 1.27, 0.3 and 1.19% lower than that of the proposed method, respectively.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be seen from the table that the accuracy, specificity and AUC of the proposed method are all higher than those of the other listed methods, reaching 96.83, 98.97 and 0.9830%, respectively. In terms of accuracy, the second highest comparison reaches 96.36% in [23], which is still 0.47% lower than that of the proposed method, and its other three indexes are 2.64, 0.21, 0.0058% lower than that of the proposed method, respectively; in terms of sensitivity, the highest comparison reaches 80.78% in [24], which is 0.12% higher than that of the proposed method, but its accuracy and specificity are 2.14 and 2.23% lower than that of the proposed method, respectively; in terms of specificity, the second highest comparison reaches 98.94% in [25], which is just 0.03% lower than that of the proposed method, and its accuracy and sensitivity are 1.81 and 6.56% lower than that of the proposed method, respectively; in terms of AUC, the second highest comparison reaches 0.9800 in [26], which is 0.0030 lower than that of the proposed method, and its other three indexes are 1.27, 0.3 and 1.19% lower than that of the proposed method, respectively.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gao et al [74] proposed a method based on Gaussian matched filter and U-net (fully convolutional neural network) for the prediction of vessel segmentation. The thin vessels were strengthened using the Gaussian matched filter while U-net was used for end-end automatic retinal vessel segmentation.…”
Section: ) Matched Filtered Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of training images available was only 39, but training was done using data augmentation. Gao et al [18] utilized U-net architecture along Gaussian matched filter to outperform the existing algorithms of blood vessel segmentation from fundus images. Work proposed in [47] consists of applying a customized loss function on U-net architecture for the purpose of segmentation of OD and OC.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%