2009
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.08-3325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retinal and Choroidal Biometry in Highly Myopic Eyes with Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography

Abstract: Posterior staphyloma formation was a key factor in choroidal thinning in highly myopic eyes. Choroidal thickness had a greater effect than retinal thickness in highly myopic eyes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

42
245
8
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 342 publications
(301 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
42
245
8
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Both of these studies used the Cirrus OCT, [45][46] which utilised the same retinal boundaries as this study but measured the foveal thickness as an average over 500 µm centred on the fovea rather than at the foveola as in this study. The values found in this study are comparable to myopic foveal thickness measurements using a similar methodology to our own, 29 and to minimum foveal thickness in normal eyes found using a stratus OCT. [45][46][47] Our overall approach to the analysis was conservative because we adopted an independent samples rather than a paired approach, despite having matched our groups for age and axial length. Based on the standard deviation of the foveal thickness measurements and the sample size, the smallest difference between groups detectable in this study was 24.8 and 64.7 µm for retinal and choroidal thickness respectively (with a power of 80% and a significance level of 0.05).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both of these studies used the Cirrus OCT, [45][46] which utilised the same retinal boundaries as this study but measured the foveal thickness as an average over 500 µm centred on the fovea rather than at the foveola as in this study. The values found in this study are comparable to myopic foveal thickness measurements using a similar methodology to our own, 29 and to minimum foveal thickness in normal eyes found using a stratus OCT. [45][46][47] Our overall approach to the analysis was conservative because we adopted an independent samples rather than a paired approach, despite having matched our groups for age and axial length. Based on the standard deviation of the foveal thickness measurements and the sample size, the smallest difference between groups detectable in this study was 24.8 and 64.7 µm for retinal and choroidal thickness respectively (with a power of 80% and a significance level of 0.05).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Multiple studies have assessed choroidal thickness in healthy individuals using the OCT, [23][24][27][28][29][30] however, only a few have used a 1060nm system. [27][28] A recent study using 1060nm OCT to investigate the correlation between axial length and choroidal thickness in 34 healthy subjects (64 eyes) aged 19-80 years, found a mean central choroidal thickness of 315m (SD 106m), with the choroid thinnest in the nasal parafovea.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that CT was negatively correlated with older age, longer AL, higher IOP, and thicker CCT. [20][21][22][23][24] In our study, multiple linear regression analysis showed that the SFCT was significantly associated with only the change in IOP. This may be due to the change in IOP, which was the most marked factor after surgery.…”
Section: Eyesupporting
confidence: 50%
“…CT in ME was thinner than in EE in the present study, corroborating previous literature (25,26) . The nasal quadrant was thinner than the fovea and the temporal quadrant, which is in agreement with a previous report (25) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%